-
Moderator
Stackings and Relationship Compatibility
Stackings can be seen in two groups.
First group:
so/sp -> sp/sx -> sx/so -> so/sp
In this group info supervised as below:
so -> sp -> sx -> so
Second group: so/sx -> sx/sp -> sp/so -> so/sx
In this group info supervised as below:
so -> sx -> sp -> so
Duality always requires opposite partners. Hence our duals have completely opposite ordered drives than us.
For example, considering that we all use three instincts so/sp/sx(sp/so) is dualized by its opposite sx/sp/so(sx/sp). They dualize by their valued flexible second sp instinct, protecting and securing each other.
The forms of relationship mainly change by the signs of second instinct.
If the sign of second instincts match, members of the same group relates each other easily while members of the opposite group energize each other.
For example for so/sp relationships are as follows:
so/sp/sx - so/sp/sx: identical
so/sp/sx - sp/sx/so: benefit (so/sp as benefactor)
so/sp/sx - sx/so/sp: benefit (so/sp as beneficiary)
so/sp/sx - sx/sp/so: dual
so/sp/sx - so/sx/sp: kindred
so/sp/sx - sp/so/sx: mirror
When the signs of instincts don't match:
so/sp/sx - so/sp/sx: quasi-identical
so/sp/sx - sp/sx/so: supervison (so/sp as supervisor)
so/sp/sx - sx/so/sp: supervison (so/sp as supervisee)
so/sp/sx - sx/sp/so: conflictor
so/sp/sx - so/sx/sp: super-ego
so/sp/sx - sp/so/sx: extinguishment
I tried to name relationships same as socionics relations since they can be similar to those although they are not exactly for each case. I can change it, explain later.
If anyone has any thoughts and opinions about this, they are appreciated.
Last edited by myresearch; 10-13-2021 at 05:03 PM.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules