That's fine, and I see @
Rune changed his mind again also, as he was last typing me as ESI but is now liking all of your posts.
I'll try to keep an open mind, but I'm a complex / kind of "out of the box" person and I expect there to be a bunch of misunderstandings about my actions. "You do X bc of this reason," when really I'm doing Y because of something else, and it just "comes off" that way because when "most people" do X, it means whatever reason you said. IDK, 99% of the time when people who don't actually know me try to evaluate me somehow, this is what it is. The other % of the time - in the typology community only, obviously - it's that people use weird points because they don't prioritize information well.
Again, I'll try to keep an open mind, and I will listen. It'll be hard to convince me, though. I've gone through a lot of types and rejected Socionics for a lack of fits until ESI clicked. I've been in the typology community for long enough to have probably already tried on and ruled out whatever you will suggest.
That said, I'd offer the weak points of my case for ESI to make it easier for you to build a case for something, but I'm not even sure what there is anymore. My only advice is to prioritize information and use main, core Socionics points, not extraneous "most ESIs will do x behavior" things.