I want to hear thoughts on this.
SEE & SLE relationship
I want to hear thoughts on this.
Two types that get easily bored and wander off can perhaps have some of the best break-up and make-up sex. The relationship will likely have a sibling-like feel, which is not a bad thing but predictability can be off-putting for these two types. They can have a lot of similar interests and directions in life so the outlook would be much more positive than negative.
a.k.a. I/O
They are a lot alike so to me they might get bored easily of the other. Not feel stimulated, too neutral and stagnant. As like I always say- everybody almost always feels stimulated by the hetero-erotic fires of opposites coming together.
although I don't think they would fight or dislike each other that much either. SEEs often have a soft spot for IEI/SLE. One is their semi-dual and one is the dual of their semi-dual. SEEs are also often the most beta-like Gamma really. The influences of the IEI is still very much in their head.
I’m sure it would be hot but I think SEE might see the weak Fi and want to hone the SLE into a more serious relationship not really trusting that they wouldn’t go cheating around.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@Tim have you ever dated an SEE?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I think I know a relationship like this
the sle thought the see was sleazy, but she didn’t think she was. she went after him at first and seemed to want something out of him. I think he got paranoid she was using him. they fought a lot, and broke up a lot. she would tear him down and then butter him up, rinse, repeat. the sle finally got tired of it. thought she was a narcissist and toxic person, and she thought he was a narcissist…. anywaythey both liked to travel and explore, and I think thats the point they really connected, but it only took them so far.
I had a one night stand with an SEE but not dated.Originally Posted by Beautiful sky
Christopher reeve's book when he was first paralyzed was written by him (SLE) and wife Dana (SEE). the corrections on the facts by the SEE is fascinating. the SEE sees things happening by the view of love and the SLE by the view of more sexual attraction
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
