Quote Originally Posted by Poptart View Post
I think MBTI gets a few things correct that socionics misses
MBTI is a test based on same dichotomies which Socionics uses.
If to take a manual to this test - there is more ideas. Among which I doubt exists something _useful_ what was not at Jung. Meanwhile and also there exist mistakes with strong contradiction to Jung as about functions of introverted types.

While Socionics is about a single idea of supplementing/opposing functions. Other is secondary and many is wrong/doubtful in Augustinavichiute's ideas.