Hey @DEAD ! Not here to add anything. Just wanted to say your threads are always fun to read through.
Hey @DEAD ! Not here to add anything. Just wanted to say your threads are always fun to read through.
I am in my head; not society.
Yes, that is who I am, hence the bold am. Also, a brain angel. (+ my own incarnation of a Zelda concept).
My thoughts align w action to succeed what needs (at least in my dreamed ideal, they do)…
Dragons:
Babies, click them to make them grow up into Kara’s Dragon Museum
My favorite adult Museum Exhibits
It's always interesting though how the Se base can get away with saying things.. I think because you exude force well, and then people with weaker Se as myself, are catching others off guard when we hit our Se hammer down... You insulted him worse than I and I insulted them without calling them name, just said what was said was of idiocy, not them, and they reacted worse to that.. Interesting.
I am in my head; not society.
Yes, that is who I am, hence the bold am. Also, a brain angel. (+ my own incarnation of a Zelda concept).
My thoughts align w action to succeed what needs (at least in my dreamed ideal, they do)…
Dragons:
Babies, click them to make them grow up into Kara’s Dragon Museum
My favorite adult Museum Exhibits
I guess maybe mine is more calculated and thought out so it looks worse and aimed more, whereas yours was a fly on the impulse and just straight with it.
I am in my head; not society.
Yes, that is who I am, hence the bold am. Also, a brain angel. (+ my own incarnation of a Zelda concept).
My thoughts align w action to succeed what needs (at least in my dreamed ideal, they do)…
Dragons:
Babies, click them to make them grow up into Kara’s Dragon Museum
My favorite adult Museum Exhibits
I admittedly only read the post where you typed him ILE. My eyes just went to ILE-Ti and Dead's SEE. I scan things mostly, being a result type.. Then I read his reaction fully (Tim's).. Then I read how you said you know best to him and the theoretical question post fully. Other than that, I did not see anything else
I am in my head; not society.
Yes, that is who I am, hence the bold am. Also, a brain angel. (+ my own incarnation of a Zelda concept).
My thoughts align w action to succeed what needs (at least in my dreamed ideal, they do)…
Dragons:
Babies, click them to make them grow up into Kara’s Dragon Museum
My favorite adult Museum Exhibits
You being butthurt ain't necessary. You two write a lot of shit in your messages. Might not be SLEs but that's your problems if you've typed yourselves wrong.
SLE are result types. The tribalism, cultism & over-identification with type on this forum is pretty square, honestly
So, what shit are you butthurt about, you moralfag?
I'm a result type. Some Pan-Jungian even battle-typing me as a Te type because I am inductive at first impression. Result types are inductive. Process types are deductive. At work, I'm more concerned about the result rather than my LSE dad who is concerned about the process. Everything is consistent with my SLE typing from Reinin's dichotomy to Model A to even Model G.SLE are result types. The tribalism, cultism & over-identification with type on this forum is pretty square, honestly
Besides, nobody in the Socionics community typed me as an ILE at all ever since I stop using MBTI logic into Socionics. People were literally laughing at that typing outside of the16types forum.
@Tim sounds like you know your shit
Quit posturing, poser. You're an internet dork who's gotten people to buy in to whatever horse shit you sell. In real life you're another childish mouthy LII-Ne.
People here type me all types of shit. They're wrong but theyre also retards. Relax, Princess. Ain't that serious
I'm not a poser at all. I am who I am. Everyone who knows me type me SLE. No one knows who the fuck are you. I'm not an LII-Ne. I'm not Se PoLR. I offend people like @thehotelambush with my Se. I have a good use of Se.
God, I want to stab you in the fucking face and pour acid on you, you bitchass retard motherfucker.
You wanna keep going, bitch. I could go on and on and I finna insult and threaten you until you cry uncle, @Stray Cat. LII-Ne and ILE my fucking ass.
Calm down guys. This is only the internet. Keep it civil and remember you might actually like each other in real life
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
And if I may add my two cents Se is sense perception. It doesn’t judge like Ti so it’s not always visible first
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@Stray Cat has the advantage of being "anonymous" The little girl wants attention, thats all.
anyone can make a troll account and be tough internet poster. just ignore it @Tim
Expression of emotions is Fe mobilizing. Rationalization is Ti valuing. I insult you because you deserve my insult and no one should have any power over me. It's not posing at all. That's my Se priority and my concern about control over this environment. So, why don't you shut the fuck up or I'm going to keep insulting you, you dimwit retard piece of shit?
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I see a SEE
Se Se Se
SEEEEEEEEE
!!!!!!!!!!!!
More NT. More predictable intellectualization. You should own it, not pretend you're SLE.
@Beautiful sky. Pretty honorable to defend your friend & I get where you're coming from
Ok I guess you guys are upset
Remember anger blinds your vision
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html