Instinct writing style

[myresearch]

This conception definitely would not hold true, especially for IEI and SEI, which can be So first... And Sx with some enne types, like 9.. I misread.. I thought you said IP, still would not though.. ESI can be Sx first.. I can see why people would think this for EII and LSI.. But you still can have deviation, and you can see Sx 5 EII and So5 LII, sometimes sx1 LSI, though rarity.

Yes every type can have any instinctual stack order. People generally associate and confuse the characteristics of temperament and type with instincts, it is understandable.

[Braingel]

Yes every type can have any instinctual stack order. People generally associate and confuse the characteristics of temperament and type with instincts, it is understandable.

I mean there is grain of truth in statement; LSI and EII very often are Sp first. Sp1 or 6 (LDI), and Sp4 or 5 (EII) respectively.. Very seldom will you see an EII that is Sx, unless they are 9.. Possibly 5. But yes, it is too much a generality and is vacuous when trying factor in all.

[myresearch]

I mean there is grain of truth in statement; LSI and EII very often are Sp first. Sp1 or 6 (LDI), and Sp4 or 5 (EII) respectively.. Very seldom will you see an EII that is Sx, unless they are 9.. Possibly 5. But yes, it is too much a generality and is vacuous when trying factor in all.

I have met with LSIs and EIIs with so first, I have met with LSIs sx first. When you met with lots of members of the same type, other typology factors become more apparent. I understand why people see some correlation and there might be but other instinctual orders are not that uncommon as people think so.

LSI so ofcourse will not be like ExFx so, especially if they are sosp, people may not think they are so first due to their main type, their instinct could be more distinguishable compared to other members of their own type. Again, e5 so is different than e3 so e2 so.