I would hope so but I doubt the real Gulenko would say this as he would have been imprisoned in Russia.Originally Posted by Gulenko AI
I would hope so but I doubt the real Gulenko would say this as he would have been imprisoned in Russia.
"Precision beats power and timing beats speed"
There is a saying in my land that, "it is better to have one friend than 10,000 enemies." This is a good motto to have in the mind whenever you are unsure whether you are making the right decision.
i think we should believe him
You kinda look a bit like young Grimes and the singer from this duo
https://www.youtube.com/live/KXyQ_C5...7HkOX31IkB5TKB
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects
What is, in your opinion, the "function(s)" responsible for the systematic evocation of similarities between faces ? I am also guilty of this "you look like" compulsion (even when it comes to voice actors "It's so and so 's voice !" and melodies) .
This is a selection of information aspects (according to Aushra definitions) needed for the task imho.
. An Information element that can perceive the the object as it is ; Se seems appropriate [Perception of the object’s appearance and form] (Note that I only use that part of Se because it's enough for the task).
. An Information element that can detect, compare and evaluate the ratio between objects ; Ti seems appropriate [Through this element the individual receives information about the objective ratio between the objects, about their weight, size, value and any other properties that are commensurate]
. An Information element that can recall an Image from subconscious memory. Now, this is a bit tricky because it seems like we don't have conscious control of the selection of the image that comes to consciousnesses. It's similar to an inspiration. I would say that Ne is at play along with Si which would give us the impression of some kind of satisfaction induced by the matching i.e a pleasant sensation of harmony (more or less).
What do you think ?
thanks for posting the videos, I will look at them. honestly I dunno what makes me recognize faces. maybe it's just experience and pattern recognition. I think Se is related to objective perception of reality, so types that value this function are often going to pay more attention to objective features of other people. despite having this one thread about IEI right now, I am not so good at that as I would like. I'm sometimes fascinated by all these online galleries that show all these facial expressions. I think with my experience, I should have had more examples overall. I just often remember that I have seen "this kind of expression" before and then I try to go back in time to remember. I don't catalogue all that much. maybe I should, but I'm too lazy and it feels a bit creepy to do.
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects
I don’t rlly look or resemble grimes at least in personality. I come off as distant and hard to reach. I guess my hair is like the brown girls hair.
Because he ain't likeable
Plus theory vs practice.. you know what I mean..
Sometimes you don't have motivation because you lack purpose.
Sometimes you don't have purpose, because you lack self-knowledge
Sometimes you don't have self-knowledge because you lack love
Sometimes you don't have love because you lack self-love
Sometimes you don't have self-love because you lack guess what? Ask Gulenko!!
I don't regard Socionics as being either theory or practice.
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
people will find something wrong or unlikable about anything, you just can’t make everyone happy. disliking something comes from the ego and is more a problem inside themselves than anything. the more someone protests, the bigger and more painful that thing is inside them.
Dr.G is a very respectable man and has greatly contributed to socionics almost since its very inception.
SHS is just different than Model A based socionics and that obviously mean that the typings results in each theoretical approach might be different, sometimes significantly. What confuses people is always the same thing namely acronyms. People assume that in socionics everybody is describing the same "types" from the same perspective because TIMs (ASC (Aushra schools of socionics !)) and sociotypes (SHS) have the same acronyms (from a western perspective !). Not to mention the fact that most westerners usually make an initial and already erroneous type acronym transposition from MBTI to socionics by assuming a 1:1 ratio. Of course, it takes time to study this stuff and there is a learning curve for each system but not everybody is willing to invest such amount of time. If anything, the first thing people have to understand is that TIMs and sociotype are not about "Personality" they are about Types of psyche (structures and configurations) and there is a world of differences between these two "phenomena".
lmao, I hope they did.
omg, if so....How embarrassing
lol
A true expert pays no attention to such frivolous gossip. There exists nothing that could be written about me which would damage either my reputation or, more importantly, the reputation of the Model G.omg, if so....How embarrassing
lol
I have developed more than any other Socionist throughout history and they could NEVER achieve what I have achieved.
Although I guess the type is changeable (a bit like all the lines on the enneagram) etc
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
