Quote Originally Posted by squark View Post
Ahhh, Jung's type. I was being slow. Interesting, as I would have thought the archetypal images was a reflection of Ni as core type. I think I see where he's coming from there though.

Absolutely no Ni in his writings. Full of Ti meta-analysis. I would say that Ni types are immersed in archetypes and therefore don't see them, whereas Jung is this calm observer who creates models to explain the workings of the psyche as an object of study.

Then it's another story that Jung as living a very full life went through a transformation and integration of the unconscious. But that is non-type related.