'Scientific Skill' and Personality

[Baqer]

Talanov actually tried to figure out what made a good scientist.

Ni Ne Si Se Ti Te Fi Fe

1.34 0.49 -0.22 -1.29 1.20 -0.03 -0.16 -1.33
0.90 0.03 -0.38 -1.48 1.63 0.37 -0.04 -1.02
0.44 0.47 0.16 0.19 -0.43 -0.40 -0.12 -0.31

1.Functional Profile Approximately Ideal for Science
2.The functional profile of the "standard" LII - of all the "standard" typical profiles, the most closely correlated with the "ideal"
3.The accentuation of the LII profile required for doing science in comparison with the profile of the standard LII


Basically he concluded that for something like science, there needs to be accentuations. For a scientist accentuated form LII, you'd need a strengthened intuition and weakened logic, as the most important creation of a scientist.

[jason_m]

Talanov actually tried to figure out what made a good scientist.

Ni Ne Si Se Ti Te Fi Fe

1.34 0.49 -0.22 -1.29 1.20 -0.03 -0.16 -1.33
0.90 0.03 -0.38 -1.48 1.63 0.37 -0.04 -1.02
0.44 0.47 0.16 0.19 -0.43 -0.40 -0.12 -0.31

1.Functional Profile Approximately Ideal for Science
2.The functional profile of the "standard" LII - of all the "standard" typical profiles, the most closely correlated with the "ideal"
3.The accentuation of the LII profile required for doing science in comparison with the profile of the standard LII


Basically he concluded that for something like science, there needs to be accentuations. For a scientist accentuated form LII, you'd need a strengthened intuition and weakened logic, as the most important creation of a scientist.

My numbers would be something like this:

Ni Ne Si Se Ti Te Fi Fe

1.34 0.49 -0.22 -1.29 1.20 -0.03 -0.16 -1.33
1.39 1.48 1.10 -1.63 1.35 -0.40 1.15 1.25
-0.05 -0.99 -1.32 0.34 -0.15 0.37 -1.31 -2.58

1.Functional Profile Approximately Ideal for Science.
2. My functional profile.
3. The accentuated profile.

Conclusion: clear Alpha (as my "liking" of those functions is proportional to their strength), clear Ne-ego, clear Se PoLR (as that function is as negative as much as I dislike it), maybe not "LII."

[Baqer]

My numbers would be something like this:

Ni Ne Si Se Ti Te Fi Fe

1.34 0.49 -0.22 -1.29 1.20 -0.03 -0.16 -1.33
1.39 1.48 1.10 -1.63 1.35 -0.40 1.15 1.25
-0.05 -0.99 -1.32 0.34 -0.15 0.37 -1.31 -2.58

Your numbers seem to be unusually high. Talanov actually does do seemingly super detailed typings over at https://vk.com/club168821911 , so that you can hopefully figure out your actual accentuations, but he's put them on hold until May. He's also got some other stuff there that he doesn't have on his proper website.

[jason_m]

Your numbers seem to be unusually high. Talanov actually does do seemingly super detailed typings over at https://vk.com/club168821911 , so that you can hopefully figure out your actual accentuations, but he's put them on hold until May. He's also got some other stuff there that he doesn't have on his proper website.

I suppose - as I'm not completely familiar with his system, look at them more as ordinal than cardinal numbers for me. I will look into that website.

[RaptorWesNet]

I suppose - as I'm not completely familiar with his system, look at them more as ordinal than cardinal numbers for me. I will look into that website.

Inaccessible Cardinal
Defined as a cardinal which cannot be obtained using arithmetic operations on cardinals.


A cardinal is also inaccessible, if it is uncountable, it is not a sum of K cardinals which are smaller than K, and a < K = 2a < K. Thus, no amount of power-setting of infinities is capable of constructing a cardinal which is inaccessible.

^ Behold the cardinal as a RED/Ash from Pokemon Chosen 1 Lugia from Pokemon 2000 Power of One as 8 being infinite zeros after 2, the ultimate synchronicity. A type 2000 Civilization has extended beyond existence and the void, or even anything in Imagination. It's a heightened computer code that hijacks and crashes the devil's security vault!!*