.
.
Last edited by Iron in Velvet; 01-09-2021 at 02:13 PM.
I don’t value Si/Ne
I think you could be SEE normalizing. I can't really explain why, but based on the SEE-Ns I've met it could fit.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I don't think strong Fi, so maybe Beta ST? Fi questions have been vague or "hard to answer" which wouldn't really fit even with 3D Fi.
INFP / IEI
You seem to lean towards irrationality. SEE?
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
What about SLE?
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I think Beta ST is more likely if not Gamma SF. But I hold my relationships in a higher priority. I will always prioritise the people I love and am very protective over them. I’ve gotten into physical fights for people I care about. I also don’t think my Ti is great, I suck at structure and such. I failed high school (but I did get my degree via other means). Just not very studious but I do like to read a ton. I’m also more likely to comment how I hate or like something