Quote Originally Posted by Nobody View Post
I wonder if you could put ethics into all the functions, such as...

Ni - ethics of wisdom
Ti - ethics of logic/integrity
Fi - ethics of reciprocity?
Si - ethics of comforts?

Te - ethics of action?
Fe - ethics of influence?
Ne - ethics of possibilities
Se - ethics of chaos?
I think trying to understand ethics/morals like this is pretty helpful. In my response, I had a go at this but I took it as an opportunity for fun mental exercise guessing IE vocabulary. To my delight, some of what I wrote down is actually considered their corresponding IE’s vocabulary! Yay for me?

What I wrote:
e.g.
Si - equilibrium = good / disequilibrium = bad
Ne - permeable = good / impermeable = bad
Se - impressive = good / unimpressive = bad
Ni - rhythmic = good / arrhythmic = bad
Te - expedient = good / inexpedient = bad
Fi - sentimental = good / unsentimental = bad
Ti - coherent = good / incoherent = bad
Fe - romantic = good / unromantic = bad


I think your take on it is much better than mine, though. It is more “in summa”, I’d say.