EliteNormie here, salutations!
I'm probably not going to post here much because I've never been a big blogger or forum fan but if you guy would like to know my personality stuff then:
- MBTI (using Jung's functions): INFP
- Enneagram: 4w5 sp/so
- Tritype: 459 (the withdrawal trio)
- Sociotype: IEI (typical lmao, but not sure what a subtype is yet)
- 3D Psyche: Existential
- Gryffindor with Ravenclaw secondary (I think?)
to put sex in the profile is useful
If you'll want to get more or just crazy opinions about your type - make a typing thread. With a videointerview. Mistakes are not rare and withour intertype relations effects it's easy to mistake in own type.
Would be better to place a data for the typing without saying your opinion about the type. As locals like to agree too much. This may need to create additional account for your typing.
Socionics is a spook
To put sex in the profile is useful
What's the purpose of SEI?
Jung's functions are the same as Socionics. Where do you get your definitions of Jung's functions? From "Psychological Types"?
Originally Posted by EliteNormie
MBTI does not follow Jung entirely.
A true sense-perception certainly exists, but it always looks as though objects were not so much forcing their way into the subject in their own right as that the subject were seeing things quite differently, or saw quite other things than the rest of mankind. As a matter of fact, the subject perceives the same things as everybody else, only, he never stops at the purely objective effect, but concerns himself with the subjective perception released by the objective stimulus.
(Jung on Si)
Think it was clarifiying Western Typology's interpretations of Jung's functions, and not the MBTI letters (official MBTI).
Originally Posted by Tallmo