He has been in the news recently
When I saw his smile I immediately thought LIE.
His subtype is not really clear to me. Creative?
The way he talks reminds me a little of Arnold Schwarzenegger (whom I also type LIE).
![]()
He has been in the news recently
When I saw his smile I immediately thought LIE.
His subtype is not really clear to me. Creative?
The way he talks reminds me a little of Arnold Schwarzenegger (whom I also type LIE).
![]()
Last edited by Tallmo; 12-17-2020 at 05:44 PM.
A true sense-perception certainly exists, but it always looks as though objects were not so much forcing their way into the subject in their own right as that the subject were seeing things quite differently, or saw quite other things than the rest of mankind. As a matter of fact, the subject perceives the same things as everybody else, only, he never stops at the purely objective effect, but concerns himself with the subjective perception released by the objective stimulus.
(Jung on Si)
My Pinterest
Definitely a strange person with some Te flair.
Peter Nygård - ESFP Napoleon
![]()
Продолжение в нашем Телеграм Каиале ссылка в описании
*** bump ***
Could I have some more opinions, please. So far we have LIE and SEE
@Adam Strange, @Comatose Lamiac 007, @dead account, @FreelancePoliceman
...and others
A true sense-perception certainly exists, but it always looks as though objects were not so much forcing their way into the subject in their own right as that the subject were seeing things quite differently, or saw quite other things than the rest of mankind. As a matter of fact, the subject perceives the same things as everybody else, only, he never stops at the purely objective effect, but concerns himself with the subjective perception released by the objective stimulus.
(Jung on Si)
My Pinterest
Seems like classical story LIE.
Uncertified public verbal executioner of ESI. Tickets will be available soon.
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Your life is too short to actually do anything useful with it without being wasteful.
SLI-Te Ni-Harmonizing sx/so
Offbeat look, talking about progress, humanitarian project is about (stemcell) research instead of actual here-and-now help indicates Ne valuing instead of Se valuing
"I reverted my aging by taking stemcells" = seems like he doesn't understand he'll die one day = sp-last
I rarely feel alone. I rarely talk to anyone, yet in my head i have the most amazing, the most fantastic discussions with the people in my life. In real life, what most people talk about is several orders of magnitude lesser than their inner experiences. Most people never reveal the singularity of their subjective experience.
Maybe I should learn to explore other people's consciousness. Maybe I should aim for a real space between me and others. Instead of cultivating monologues and fantasies. It's hard, but the alternative to this seems to be madness. ~ lkdhf qkb
Life is soup. I'm fork
A true sense-perception certainly exists, but it always looks as though objects were not so much forcing their way into the subject in their own right as that the subject were seeing things quite differently, or saw quite other things than the rest of mankind. As a matter of fact, the subject perceives the same things as everybody else, only, he never stops at the purely objective effect, but concerns himself with the subjective perception released by the objective stimulus.
(Jung on Si)
My Pinterest
I never do 2 subtype theory but contact/inert theory instead. So when I say Te subtype for SLI, then it means boosted contact functions Te, Ti, Ne & Ni, not just Te.
In DCNH, there are 2 types of Harmonizers, Ni or Si:
He looks creative subtype but I think it has more to do with his instinctual stacking which I think is sx/so. The dude looks connecting, initial & distant when looking at the DCNH dichotomies.
EDIT: I realized I didn't completely answer your question. Harmonizers have, according to Gulenko, fixated Si & Ni, and emphasized Polr, here Fe. However DCNH fixation isn't the same as "boosting" of model A functions. Boosting means increased processing power and flow of information. Fixation means having strong views on how a function has to be used, but it doesn't mean you're "better" at processing information on those aspects. For example, normalizers have strong views on how to behave correctly(fixated functions are responsible for "behavioural regulations" : Ti & Fi), but normalizing Ejs aren't that good at determining what's "correct".
Last edited by lkdhf qkb; 12-18-2020 at 04:54 PM.
I rarely feel alone. I rarely talk to anyone, yet in my head i have the most amazing, the most fantastic discussions with the people in my life. In real life, what most people talk about is several orders of magnitude lesser than their inner experiences. Most people never reveal the singularity of their subjective experience.
Maybe I should learn to explore other people's consciousness. Maybe I should aim for a real space between me and others. Instead of cultivating monologues and fantasies. It's hard, but the alternative to this seems to be madness. ~ lkdhf qkb
Life is soup. I'm fork
A true sense-perception certainly exists, but it always looks as though objects were not so much forcing their way into the subject in their own right as that the subject were seeing things quite differently, or saw quite other things than the rest of mankind. As a matter of fact, the subject perceives the same things as everybody else, only, he never stops at the purely objective effect, but concerns himself with the subjective perception released by the objective stimulus.
(Jung on Si)
My Pinterest
I rarely feel alone. I rarely talk to anyone, yet in my head i have the most amazing, the most fantastic discussions with the people in my life. In real life, what most people talk about is several orders of magnitude lesser than their inner experiences. Most people never reveal the singularity of their subjective experience.
Maybe I should learn to explore other people's consciousness. Maybe I should aim for a real space between me and others. Instead of cultivating monologues and fantasies. It's hard, but the alternative to this seems to be madness. ~ lkdhf qkb
Life is soup. I'm fork
Isn't he the typical robber baron? Also known as LIE dominant. It materialized in fashion sphere so it makes him just bit more flashy compared to the regular robber baron.From Gulenko's description LIE creative tends to be fatter and look like a child while being driven towards more esoteric fields.
Uncertified public verbal executioner of ESI. Tickets will be available soon.
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Your life is too short to actually do anything useful with it without being wasteful.
A true sense-perception certainly exists, but it always looks as though objects were not so much forcing their way into the subject in their own right as that the subject were seeing things quite differently, or saw quite other things than the rest of mankind. As a matter of fact, the subject perceives the same things as everybody else, only, he never stops at the purely objective effect, but concerns himself with the subjective perception released by the objective stimulus.
(Jung on Si)
My Pinterest
LIE
Peter's overall energy is high and projecting outwards, like he's trying to communicate to the audience his plans to make the world a better place. Head nods/shakes byproducts of speech.(EJ)
Doesn't give off an impression of EP (animated) or IP (stillness)
Te is apparent in speech, lacks warmth of an Fe
Optimistic. Visionary. Eccentric in clothing/appearance. Embracing technology into the future (Ni > Si)
Last edited by DrDonkeyBallz; 12-18-2020 at 11:24 PM.
I don’t know many LIEs, but I think it’s correct.
His way of talking and the way he carries himself reminds me of EIEs’, actually, likely because of the factors @Petersononfireee mentioned. But he’s obviously not an Fe base.