He has been in the news recently
When I saw his smile I immediately thought LIE.
His subtype is not really clear to me. Creative?
The way he talks reminds me a little of Arnold Schwarzenegger (whom I also type LIE).
/https://www.thestar.com/content/dam/thestar/news/canada/2020/08/17/two-of-canadian-fashion-mogul-peter-nygards-sons-file-lawsuit-alleging-rape/peter_nygard.jpg)
Peter Nygård
He has been in the news recently
When I saw his smile I immediately thought LIE.
His subtype is not really clear to me. Creative?
The way he talks reminds me a little of Arnold Schwarzenegger (whom I also type LIE).
Last edited by Tallmo; 12-17-2020 at 05:44 PM.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Definitely a strange person with some Te flair.
Peter Nygård - ESFP Napoleon
This is the comment you are looking for
*** bump ***
Could I have some more opinions, please. So far we have LIE and SEE
@Adam Strange, @Comatose Lamiac 007, @dead account, @FreelancePoliceman
...and others
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Seems like classical story LIE.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
SLI-Te Ni-Harmonizing sx/so
Offbeat look, talking about progress, humanitarian project is about (stemcell) research instead of actual here-and-now help indicates Ne valuing instead of Se valuing
"I reverted my aging by taking stemcells" = seems like he doesn't understand he'll die one day = sp-last
Originally Posted by lkdhf qkb
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
How can a Te sub be harmonizing?
I never do 2 subtype theory but contact/inert theory instead. So when I say Te subtype for SLI, then it means boosted contact functions Te, Ti, Ne & Ni, not just Te.
In DCNH, there are 2 types of Harmonizers, Ni or Si:
He looks creative subtype but I think it has more to do with his instinctual stacking which I think is sx/so. The dude looks connecting, initial & distant when looking at the DCNH dichotomies.
EDIT: I realized I didn't completely answer your question. Harmonizers have, according to Gulenko, fixated Si & Ni, and emphasized Polr, here Fe. However DCNH fixation isn't the same as "boosting" of model A functions. Boosting means increased processing power and flow of information. Fixation means having strong views on how a function has to be used, but it doesn't mean you're "better" at processing information on those aspects. For example, normalizers have strong views on how to behave correctly(fixated functions are responsible for "behavioural regulations" : Ti & Fi), but normalizing Ejs aren't that good at determining what's "correct".
Last edited by lkdhf qkb; 12-18-2020 at 04:54 PM.
Hey, I made that chartIt seems to have drifted off on the internet.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
haha so nice! I use your knowledge to convince peopleHey, I made that chart
Isn't he the typical robber baron? Also known as LIE dominant. It materialized in fashion sphere so it makes him just bit more flashy compared to the regular robber baron.From Gulenko's description LIE creative tends to be fatter and look like a child while being driven towards more esoteric fields.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Yes. I can totally see LIE-D. He just seemed like slightly C also. But the LIE-Cs I've met are more "in the head" than he is.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
LIE
Peter's overall energy is high and projecting outwards, like he's trying to communicate to the audience his plans to make the world a better place. Head nods/shakes byproducts of speech.(EJ)
Doesn't give off an impression of EP (animated) or IP (stillness)
Te is apparent in speech, lacks warmth of an Fe
Optimistic. Visionary. Eccentric in clothing/appearance. Embracing technology into the future (Ni > Si)
Last edited by Computer Loser; 12-18-2020 at 11:24 PM.
LIE. I agree with your schwarzenegger typing tallmo
I don’t know many LIEs, but I think it’s correct.
His way of talking and the way he carries himself reminds me of EIEs’, actually, likely because of the factors @Petersononfireee mentioned. But he’s obviously not an Fe base.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
