Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: 100% Accurate Socionics Test!

  1. #1
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,331
    Mentioned
    318 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Post 100% Accurate Socionics Test!

    At last, I've devised a 100% accurate socionics test. It is completely web-based, free, and is not only far more accurate than any other existing test, it is immensely more convenient and less time-consuming. No more slogging through endless pages of questions with vague and confusing wording. No more wading through poorly machine-translated descriptions to confirm your typing. The test has been so streamlined that it is also suitable for non-English speakers.

    Note: the test has been known to malfunction. This is perfectly normal - this is, perhaps, the first test of its kind. You may have to retake it to ensure an accurate result. But the good news is, unlike any other test, you are guaranteed to obtain an accurate result as long as you don't give up prematurely. You heard it here first.

    Link to test here.

    An Enneagram test has also been devised, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Posts
    51
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got esi thanks

  3. #3
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    13,608
    Mentioned
    1339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got ILE. Then I took it again and got LSE. I’m sure I’m going somewhere with this.

  4. #4
    chriscorey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    TIM
    ILE-pars pro toto
    Posts
    3,464
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got IEI and then I got SEE

  5. #5
    edgy princess eiemo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    a vacuum
    TIM
    no clue
    Posts
    232
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got LIE.





  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    TIM
    currently, ILE-Ne
    Posts
    48
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I am now officially SLI

  7. #7
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,160
    Mentioned
    83 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You gave me IEE. You are so dead to me

  8. #8
    Haikus Aria's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    TIM
    IEI Sx/So, VELF
    Posts
    553
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Happy to report I've reached self-dualization and am now SLE.

  9. #9
    FreelancePoliceman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    3,986
    Mentioned
    363 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    LIE

  10. #10
    Akira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2017
    TIM
    ISTp sxsp
    Posts
    3,379
    Mentioned
    410 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    That's how most ppl type others in here no?

  11. #11
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,160
    Mentioned
    83 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Basically the wheel of death.

  12. #12
    cassiopeia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    TIM
    SEI 6w7
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I took the test, and this is definetely the best one out there! It was so quick, only took a couple seconds.
    It gave me LII. Everything makes so much more sense now. Thank you for sharing it.

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    13,186
    Mentioned
    1239 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Your assertion about objectively high or even 100% accuracy of some method is baseless speculation and a misleading.

    At 1st you need to do an objective experiment which proves high (more to say 100%) accuracy of some method. Not just that you subjectively assured in results and never changed opinions - but objective basis. Alike when you'd predict/expected some clearly seen behavior based on method's results and then that behavior has happened in high (or that 100%) of cases, where the number of cases was statistically acceptable. Only then there will be reasonable basis to claim about objectively high accuracy of some method in your or someone's usage.
    Also when there will be absolutely objective basis to think some type, only then you'll can claim about 100% accuracy of some method. There is no such known criterions. By all today methods types are only supposed as possible to be some, based on the known limited behavior. As that behavior has probability nature too - Jung type is one of factors that makes that behavior.

    The real situation is that you, as anyone today, have low real typing match (<50% or mb close to that) by behavioral methods with any other experienced typer and <50% in average with them. So your typing accuracy is doubtful to be high, - as it's not high from _subjective_ point of any other today typer. While you have no _objective_ experimental proof to claim about your high typing accuracy by any method.
    Also your usage of doubtful baseless theory alike Reinin's traits and sometimes strange understanding of basic theory predispose you to more mistakes.

    Resume
    Make an _objective_ proof for the doubtful assertion about high accuracy of some typing method.
    Do not mislead about 100% _objective_ accuracy which is imposible by known behavioral approaches, in principle.

    P.S.
    oh.. that was a joke this time
    I saw claims of ~95% accuracy from some typer and he was serious. Saw claims about similar real(!) typing matches between 2 typers. So have low expectations about objectivity in accuracy evaluations, especially claimed publicly by those who has paid typing service.
    And to read the whole introduction was too boring.
    Last edited by Sol; 12-10-2020 at 02:39 PM.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  14. #14
    Seed my wickedness Existential Ibuprofen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    ILE LEVF/#unfit4lyfe
    Posts
    7,082
    Mentioned
    305 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    But if the universe gives up prematurely? Nvm I'm part of it. Or am I?
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    13,186
    Mentioned
    1239 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    "But the good news is, unlike any other test, you are guaranteed to obtain an accurate result as long as you don't give up prematurely."

    I'd note that the 100% chance to get the correct type in accidental choices happens only with infinite number of tries. As it's impossibly on practice, then there is <100% chance to get the correct type.
    Understanding of this objective limitation is "mature" behavior and hence to stop doing this test in any moment is not "prematurely".
    So now you have obligations for us due to your claim about guarantees.
    Types examples: video bloggers, actors

  16. #16
    ⊱⋆painting the roses red⋆⊰ reverie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    TIM
    IEI~N
    Posts
    2,738
    Mentioned
    494 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    LII!

    thehotelambush is my identical?!

    ·:*¨༺༻¨*:·.𝓽𝓾𝓶𝓫𝓵𝓻·:*¨༺ ༻¨*:·.
    քɨռȶɛʀɛֆȶ
    ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈 ♓︎ 𝓅𝒾𝓈𝒸𝑒𝓈
    ♍︎ 𝓋𝒾𝓇𝑔𝑜 𝓇𝒾𝓈𝒾𝓃𝑔 ♍︎

  17. #17
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,263
    Mentioned
    126 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Figured it was a joke.

    Vague and confusing wording though.... Really accurate description of most tests lol.

    "Do you X or Y?"

    "Hell if I know lmao. I just do -- if I do anything at all."

    Some questions are difficult because one part fits and the other doesn't.

    Example from sociotype.com: you're pragmatic and seek to benefit yourself. You're humanitarian and seek to benefit society. I'm not really a pragmatic person but I seek to benefit myself I think. Nonetheless I think I'm more considerate than quite a few of the people I live close to.

    PS I got SLE.

    I usually have a particularly difficult time with questions used to gauge the logic vs ethics dichotomy, similar to @Grendel.
    Last edited by Aramas; 12-10-2020 at 03:56 PM.

  18. #18
    Enlightened Hedonist Subteigh's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    17,741
    Mentioned
    390 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    I got LSE.

    Excellent test - great result to energy ratio, which is what I need when I have business meetings to take care of.

    My only criticism is that it is not aesthetically pleasing - it reminds me of the people I see moping about in the Poetry section at Barnes & Noble when I'm looking for discount hefty tomes I can use for weightlifting.

    Where do I send the $120 to?

  19. #19
    ouronis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    TIM
    ref to ptr to self
    Posts
    2,472
    Mentioned
    106 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    It's accurate about 6% of the time

  20. #20
    kingslayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    USA
    TIM
    SLE Sx/Sp
    Posts
    705
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Took it exactly once and got SLE. pretty good test

  21. #21
    Aramas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,263
    Mentioned
    126 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kingslayer View Post
    Took it exactly once and got SLE. pretty good test
    We're identicals now. Show me the Cubans.

  22. #22
    Jesus is the cruel sausage consentingadult's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,777
    Mentioned
    107 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I thought it was going to be my lucky day, but it turned out not to be the wheel of fortune...
    “I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking

  23. #23
    Uncle Ave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    5,210
    Mentioned
    180 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    100% accurate?
    What good is a book that does not even transport us beyond all books?

    ~Nietzsche

  24. #24
    MrInternet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    TIM
    IP sp/sx
    Posts
    3,473
    Mentioned
    133 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    SLI, ESI, LII, sure that works

  25. #25
    Djinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2019
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    381
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ILI then ESE?

    seems legit

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •