Originally Posted by
Duschia
I've never talked about being a LII. You are making this up - since coming there (to this forum), I've wondered 'which Te-type I am'. You have no evidence to support your claims, and that counts as slander, lol.
I've never tried to hid I had a former account in the first place. In fact, I've told everyone so (hey, I'm Mesn) when I've joined with this one. I've never tried to lie about my own typing and there is continuity between those two accounts. What was left out of Mesn - little traces - all tell how I was typing as delta ST (LSE), and that was a recurring theme when I started this account. Since then, I've seriously analyzed myself and came to the conclusion I have now. Before joining and when I was younger, my first typing was LIE. Then, as I've realized I'm no LIE (I'm too snarky), I've looked at EIE (first) and LSE (later; those in hindsight are negativistic and DA as ILIs are, but I think it was more about me not knowing socionics that well).
When I joined this forum, it was 'okay, so not LIE, so maybe LSE'. People suggested me SLI (or just Fe-PoLR) quite a few times after I've posted my video, so I started exploring Fe-PoLR and - in hindsight - this is where I really learned and realized some things about myself (and the big difference between wanting/aspiring and being - I want to be more active, I would like to be so, but I'm, in fact, quite low in activity). There was no LII, ever. No Alpha in discussion at all.
This whole thing took years (from me typing as LIE when I was 16, then joining forum 1.5 years ago to now), as me knowing socionics at I would say 'lower advanced' level is fairly recent (less than a year). This is not similar to what OP's journey is, as OP went across ESE, SEE, SLE and so on, with many 'what ifs' over relatively short time. And five threads.
I could also go 'lol but everything else is irrelevant' with any of your posts, but it's not constructive, only obstructive.