From what I hear Judge Barret is pro-life. I wonder if her opinion extends into the law of the land. Surely on a lawful basis, prochoice, the right for a woman to terminate her own pregnancy safely and lawfully, should always stand, even if you yourself do not agree with it.

There are a number of mammals who terminate their pregnancies if their instincts tell them to do so.

I do not think Barret would actively fight to have this right reversed. I do think she is a person who would strive to conserve what is.

On a related note, its hypocritical of a social Conservative Government to support foreign governments, like China, who practise infanticide frequently with their past 1 child policy. I guess what is good for the goose is not good for the gander.