Quote Originally Posted by DirectorAbbie View Post
Interesting, but it looks like the "most beneficial type" list is just a list of [reverse] flow direction.

As a triple-compliant, I got this: "126 (The Supporter): Type 4, 5, 9"
But then: "459 (The Contemplative): Type 3, 7, 8"
So I'm not my duals's dual? That's not dualism then.

There's also "378 (The Mover & Shaker): Type 1, 2, 6" but 3, 7, and 8 are my least-favorite of each triad.

Looks like the recommendation is just to share one bit in tritype.

What I relate to in order:
1, 6, 5, 2, 9, 7, 3, 8, 4

What I prefer in order (afaik):
6, 4, 1, 9, 5, 2, 3, 7, 8
I think it's saying that for some types you have more than one enneagram dual so a 126 tritype would like 4s, 5s and 9s. And yes it is not duality because you will not be your dual's dual :s But I think it says that one partner being the dual will create a type of 'social glue'. So for example I have been friends with lots of 268s and have a had 146/126 close friends too and their dual can be 9 (me). They weren't necessarily healthiest friendships.. but I have def had frequent friendships (some very good) with these types.