Results 1 to 40 of 136

Thread: Amazing 1983 Prophecy: Donald Trump will lead America back to God

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    2,199
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sbbds View Post
    What’s the point of your pictures? Don’t you understand word syntax? They still say that they want to disrupt it.

    @End is right. It’s a stated fact by them that it’s their goal.
    Word syntax says the last word in the chain of modifiers is the noun, those before are adjectives.

    Nuclear: adjective
    Family: adjective
    Structure: adjective
    Requirement: noun

    "We disrupt the... requirement." Not "we disrupt the... traditional" or "we disrupt the... structure."
    It certainly didn't say "we disrupt the nuclear family structure option." It says requirement.

  2. #2
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    EII typed by Gulenko
    Posts
    4,654
    Mentioned
    339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    Word syntax says the last word in the chain of modifiers is the noun, those before are adjectives.

    Nuclear: adjective
    Family: adjective
    Structure: adjective
    Requirement: noun

    "We disrupt the... requirement." Not "we disrupt the... traditional" or "we disrupt the... structure."
    It certainly didn't say "we disrupt the nuclear family structure option." It says requirement.
    Ok... and they want to disrupt it.

    They see the traditional family structure as a requirement (or more accurately see the world as seeing it that way). And they want to disrupt it and/or the requirement for it. Regardless they are anti-family structure as it currently is.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    2,199
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sbbds View Post
    Ok... and they want to disrupt it.

    They see the traditional family structure as a requirement (or more accurately see the world as seeing it that way). And they want to disrupt it and/or the requirement for it. Regardless they are anti-family structure as it currently is.
    Opposing something means opposing allowing it as an option. Opposing it as a requirement allows choice.

    Choice is good.

  4. #4
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    EII typed by Gulenko
    Posts
    4,654
    Mentioned
    339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grendel View Post
    Opposing something means opposing allowing it as an option. Opposing it as a requirement allows choice.

    Choice is good.
    Well I’m glad you don’t believe you’re going extinct anymore but I still think the highly male-excluding language as @End pointed out is highly worrying. They don’t even mention the word “father” at all, but say “parents”. It reeks of people who are triggered and afraid to trigger others; running from emotions because of pain. Running from emotions means not solving problems that need to be addressed unemotionally.

    ”We make our spaces family-friendly and enable parents to fully participate with their children. We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work “double shifts” so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work.

    Also, what the fuck? This seems to imply that all WOMEN or all mothers are supposed to be SJWs that are fighting towards their agenda.

    And how is working a double shift patriarchal? Women doing double shifts is a result of feminism and women wanting to work more.

    Nice find and source posting @End . Good eye. Fuck this bullshit.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Posts
    2,199
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sbbds View Post
    Well I’m glad you don’t believe you’re going extinct anymore but I still think the highly male-excluding language as @End pointed out is highly worrying. They don’t even mention the word “father” at all, but say “parents”. It reeks of people who are triggered and afraid to trigger others; running from emotions because of pain. Running from emotions means not solving problems that need to be addressed unemotionally.

    ”We make our spaces family-friendly and enable parents to fully participate with their children. We dismantle the patriarchal practice that requires mothers to work “double shifts” so that they can mother in private even as they participate in public justice work.

    Also, what the fuck? This seems to imply that all WOMEN or all mothers are supposed to be SJWs that are fighting towards their agenda.

    And how is working a double shift patriarchal? Women doing double shifts is a result of feminism and women wanting to work more.
    If I had to guess, it's related to the fact that two income household used to be a cheat that only some families used to pay mortgage, but became a race to the bottom somehow with the housing sector where you all but needed to be two income to stay competitive and pay the mortgage off. Doesn't mean they're gonna help that at all though.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •