Ni

[sbbds]

Vortical synergetic cognition is more like a coalescence of impressions/ideas, rapidly tested, rather than a turning, multi-perspective based style. Vorticals often have a "eureka" moment where everything seems to click- u can see the positivism here. Her individual perspective is more like a bunch of ideas based on seeing the situation from many different angles. It's complimentary to vortical because as she tests perspectives, her dual sees one that's the perfect fit

Vortical-synergetic doesn’t have the eureka clicking moment. That’s more like HP or CD, static cognition styles. Vortical style is more like a dynamic, chaotic vortex.

”Clicking” is more like socionics negativism as well. Positivism is more about adding more information. Negativism is reductionist.

This is part of why dynamic negativism (DA) and static positivism (CD) are seen as less stable than HP and VS are— because they’re contradictory, in a sense. A static “click” that actually adds more information is counter-intuitive (in the colloquial sense).

And she didn’t say that her dual “sees the one that’s the perfect fit”. She described it as seeing an image filled in from different angles, with as little holes left as possible. That’s literally HP cognition:

H-P cognitive style: LII, SLE, ESI, IEE
This is imprecise, multi-perspective thinking. It is mosaic-like. It works according to the principle of a hologram - the creation of three-dimensional representation of the object through the imposition of several of its sections. It is suitable for solving complex multifactor problems that have no clear-cut algorithms.

https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...Victor-Gulenko

HP works by superimposing perspectives of different angles until a wholesome view with minimal “holes” is reached.