finally, here we go.. saving this here for later viewing.
The holy LSI thread aka IEE vs EIE video
You are Ne-base, so the intention is there, but we all know it is never going to materialize.Originally Posted by shotgunfingers
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
I'm whatever Gulenko says I am.
Each person is entitled to choose their own God (and live with the consequences).
Besides. Gulenko is LII, what the fuck does he know about people?
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
:> wtf do random nobodies lurking on a forum know about people?
He typed me LSI for good reasons, I agree with his reasoning. That is all it needs to be.
I an fact do know a lot about people. Unlike Gulenko's, my understanding of Socionics is not cut off from understanding mainstream psychology, sociology, social psychology and cultural anthropology. I am, by all definitions, not a nobody. You, on the other hand, just arrived here. And you will not be around long, not even long enough to build a proper understranding of Socionics.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Nice threat. No credentials. No experience to speak of. Words.
If that's the kind of place this is, then I'll be better off and thankful for it.
This is a good video
I look forward to reading your take aways
"I take back like half of the exclamation points.....they make me look....eager to please. Which I AM....but I don't want anyone to KNOW that"
- Carrie Fisher
You say that as if you’re a people rather than a random nobody.
I'm a random nobody here as well. I suck at typing others so I won't even try.
Imo the above video is a good way to distinguish EIE from IEE and so it is useful to me as an LSI as well as for other ppl who are interested in seeing which one they relate to more in case they are one of those types.
e_e it seems tho that some ppl aren't taking my typing by G. as LSI well. Regardless I give authorities more weight, it makes sense to, considering his experience and knowledge of the subject. If you don't like it, leave me to my foolishness. If this shit continues, I will blacklist each and every one of you one by one.
I have made myself clear. Last warning.
Lol @ trying to act as if more aggressive because of new LSI typing.
Thats one.
One what?
One Se-less warning? Lol
I have been here for fourteen years, I can't help it that you only just arrived and haven't had the time yet to stumble into many of my recent posts here, or my blog, which imho is full of original insights. Your ignorance does not say anything at all about me, or my competence as a Socionist.
Your posts on this forum show a very typical pattern of an Fe-mobilizing person, those who have been here long enough have seen people like you many times before, so we already know were this is going.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Two.Shotgun, you did exactly the same when you tried with typing ILI again and 'showing that Fi valuation'.Just with what you perceive(d) as Fi.
Three.
Whatever you say, you are still an Fe-Mobilizing attention seeking ILE like we have seen here so many timesnbefore. And like those, you too have a problem accepting who you really are. This is why you paid Gulenko money: not to really get to know your type, but to not have to accept the way you are. Trust me, it is hard to come to terms with who you are, but once you have done it, you will no longer have a reason to hate yourself, and all the reasons to love yourself and put yourself out there in the world.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
jeez why do people take it so seriously when someone types as something different than what they typed them?
It's not a personal attack on you that they don't agree with you and it's not any stress to you if they are mistyped. Just leave them to it
"I take back like half of the exclamation points.....they make me look....eager to please. Which I AM....but I don't want anyone to KNOW that"
- Carrie Fisher
Perhaps you could link some of your stuff? 14 years is a lot, and I really want to see your writing.
I could try and convince them or just continuously rebut their assertions with logic, but its unclear to me if its genuine concern, personal amusement trying to confuse ppl or just ego related.
The reason I payed for a professional typing session was partly to settle the question and partly to finally have an answer and not waste time doubting & searching. From my perspective this is case closed.
I'm not interested in their subjective opinions, which only distract and annoy, so I blocked them.
Well he called the people on this forum “random nobodies” while referring to himself as “people” lol.
I don’t take it personally but if he’s acting like a dumbass and being rude too then I see no reason not to tease him for it.
I mean you could, if you had 4D Ti that is.
I wouldn't know how to link to posts on this forum (which is why I started a blog), but here's my blog:
https://mavericksocionics.blogspot.com/
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Pay no attention to these people.
Half of them have a certain idea of their quadra or of the sociotype from experience with people to whom they assign types by observing certain behaviors that they believe are characteristics the said sociotype or through IR (the case of the man with the bear avatar I guess) and they reject what a professional with twenty years of professional experience in the field has to say simply because of that. Some of them may not like the way you see the world and cannot accept that you are a sociotype with whom they would get along, I don't know.
I imagine you have gone through what I am going through now, reading descriptions and not being able to relate them to yourself, it's understandable because on the one hand the descriptions of IM are extremely vague (some behaviors or though patterns can be viewed from the lenses of different IM for example) and on the other hand the descriptions of the sociotypes are too specific at times, causing there to be details that do not fit, or details from whole different sociotypes fitting like a glove. I still have to read the description of the LSI-H to be able to know if this specific sociotype is aggressive, but from what I myself have investigated about LSI-Ti (Which would be LSI-N in Gulenko's subtype model) it is not that aggressive, and an LSI-Si subtype might not behave aggressively considering the descriptions of what a harmonizing subtype is (seeking harmony, lacking some negative characteristics of the original type, etc).
I am not the kind of person who respects or assigns traits to individuals based on their academic titles, but Gulenko has an inmense amount of experience in the field and is a prominent figure in socionics, while the ones opposing your typing are people lurking on an internet forum. It's not like you want to be an LSI and they are opposing it, it's that someone they have been praising and quoting has assigned a sociotype they like to someone who's not following the modern collective ethos, and that makes them mad.
Last edited by RBRS; 09-02-2020 at 03:45 PM.
Also. For anyone reading this, SGF has changed his mind back and forth a million times on whether he “gets along with me or not” lol. Sometimes he’s referred to me as “one of his favorite people on the forum”, etc.
It’a always something really extreme. Part of why Fi polr seems so reasonable for him.
Could be, I oppose the modern collective ethos, so yeah..
Btw, you considered EIE and IEI as types no? Maybe the above video will be useful in some way. I recommend it.
Yeah, you are right, but I need my perspective or worldview, in which I'm included.. to make sense and to be reliable.. <.< because I act/navigate according to it's logic. So for me this information is important.
>.> <.< Because I’m LSI.. >.> <.< amirite guys? >.> <.< Do I look/sound LSI enough to you yet? >.> <.<
I considered those types simply because I posted a video for diagnosis, and a questionnaire in another forum, both responses agreed on Beta NF, although I'm not sure of it, mainly because of the social aspect (I have problems in that area). About the IEE typing, I haven't considered it mainly because I tend to be demanding with others regarding consistency (For example, imagine someone tells me a personal story and then changes the details of it if I ask him a month later, it gives me a little bit of mistrust) and also because I daily interact with someone tested as LSE, and it doesn't seem like a synergetic relationship (although we get along).
I'm thinking about doing the Gulenko's diagnosis when I get more money to have a definite type.
Last edited by RBRS; 09-02-2020 at 04:35 PM.
It’s because you’re beneficiary/benefactor types Duschia. Get with the program.
... Ok tbh though you too before have spent time arguing with me on how your friends say you have “no Ni to speak of”...We should talk IRL so I could show you my magickal Ni powers shotgun lacks.
No offense bro I still like you but just saying.
The frequent use of emojis and similar devices such as reaction images, different fonts etc. does remind me of another LSI here, namely @onfireee
Both are inflammatory posters who seek similar-minded people. Being on the C/H axis combined with the social orientation of LSI it isn't all that surprising.
The more stereotypical and drier LSI (D/N sub) strikes me as a type that wouldn't even register on these forums in the first place, especially the N type. I know a couple of those types in real life, and forums like these hold zero interest for them.
Just like almost everyone here, you and his duals included.
I wasn’t referencing his use of emojis at all, but his tendency to BLATANTLY and obviously change his wording of things to match his self-typing (or “G”-typing...) of the hour.
Even if he is LSI, I think he deserves to be mocked for this, especially if he’s going to be rude and mock other people.
And I’m skeptical of the typing even if I may agree in the end. Maybe it’s due to being Ti valuing, but I’m not interested in appeals to authority.
Can you name even one person who has done this as extremely and often as SGF has? It’s obviously about the degree.
I think ENFj are more tolerant over all, even though it might not seem like it at face value.
Weak and needed Si + Te takes a lot of energy to fill.
I don't see him changing his posting style, political opinions or music taste at all based on whatever his typing has been. It's always been the same.
What he does do, though, is change all the window dressing attached to his forum presence such as avatar, signature, location etc. Basically everything except the basic structure of his signature and the username.
His opinions stay. He just draws new conclusions about how it could be explained because of socionics, why he dislikes a particular quadra or type and vice versa.
If you consider how LSI always has to exist within a system, it makes good sense. They are the opposite of loners that go their own way, they want to fit in a group and wear the "uniform" or "colors" of whatever that is. Not dissimilar from what EIE do, really.
All his typings in other systems, especially the enneagram 6 which he strongly identifies with, have remained the same and he often used these to cast doubt on his socionics typing when he saw something being contradictory.
He keeps looking for contradictions in each typing and that is the driver for the type hopping. Many Ne leads, especially IEE, seem to be remarkably static and resistant to changing their type so I wouldn't attribute that trait to Ne.
In fact, leading Ti probably makes it harder because of the constant searching for flawless fit without contradictions (arguably Ti with Ne being H-P is better at seeing the different perspectives, while C-D cog types according to mr. DarkAngelFireWolf69 have the most trouble with socionics):
"He freely makes logical assertions, often exaggerated, about new information and experience. He holds highest those rules to which exceptions do not exist"
When it comes to appeals of authority, I often see Ti leading types deferring to authority if it is related to someone's long experience and obvious expertise, however only when they themselves have accepted someone being worthy of that. It's not something lightly given.
Yes and that classically matches using Ti in a creative manner, not a staunch LSI. An LSI, even being Ne polr, would typically notice their extreme changeability and take it with a stronger grain of salt that they maybe aren’t an Ij type... (this is a thought exercise obviously)
The problem is that these “new conclusions” he draws are often in such extreme contradiction of one another. Ti leads are supposed to be able to IDENTIFY contradictions, not CREATE them like a fountain out of their asses.
I do think he might be LSI at this point though... he definitely uses his Ne in an “extreme” manner.
That quote was actually from the "Ti as a leading function" column on sociotype.com, lol. I would actually see LSI as more likely to reset all the rules to a new system just to avoid any contradictions, while Ti creative isn't too bothered by them and would happily twist them to further their agenda. Logic being a tool to be used and discarded, not something that has to fit perfectly at all times.
I think the constant contradictions were bothering him and driving him crazy instead of being fun thought experiments one after another (as I'd expect from ILE, maybe even with a trolling purpose). I'm willing to consider him having stopped the type hopping now. Maybe even the blocking of naysayers is a sign of that. Personally I think blocking people is completely unnecessary and I haven't even blocked Sol, but maybe sowing seeds of doubt is actually painful to Ne polr / Type 6.
Oh interesting. Good quote. Sorry, I originally didn’t even read that part of your post after I read about your perspective of him not showing changeability lol.
Yeah, I agree that I wouldn’t block people on the same grounds he does either and it makes sense.
He blocked us obviously because he does care, and I’m analyzing a) because I know based on history he’s going to unblock us within a day or two if not sooner, and b) because this is a forum about analyzing personality types, you fucknut.
The underlined is good evidence away from him being an aggressor, btw, so you’re not adding to his case.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
