What is your sub-subtype?

[xerxe]

We all know about subtypes, yet no one seems brave enough to go further than that. What do you think your sub-subtype is? What about your sub-sub-subtype?

[chocolatte]

I am IEI-Ni-Fe with a sprinkle of Ti and some Ne Fi crumbs pushed under the rug

[Chiquichiquaquiles]

I am IEI with the Fe creative of SEI and the Fe polr of ILI.

[Chin Diaper 007]

I typed myself as IEF (Ne-Fe-Se) sub-sub-sub when I typed myself creative (that's probably not me based on manifestation ).

[Sol]

We all know about subtypes

but not all understand that there are no useful subtypes theory
while there are different personal traits, besides Jung types, to take into account

[Claudius]

I'm an EII with a paranoid Si and the ability to switch into a weak Te at any moment. Oh, and some weird variation of Ni when I'm tired.

[Frddy]

I'm a confused sack of shit who's there to ruin your post

[Duschia]

Even when you consider that DCNH (I thing the most 'next thing' by popular opinion) is true/useful, it actually has this bit 'people change their subtypes'. So, perhaps you can indeed be mixed subtypes at any given moment and then you sub-sub-(unsub)-type.

But is it needed or useful? I think types have considerable variation and various manifestations and I approve attempts at 'subtyping', but maybe a 'here are examples of these various manifestations and cases' should be the first step, not starting from a 'systemic' build and... Idk, kinda failing. Then build a system out of those, not theory on theory on theory.

[chocolatte]

I'm a confused sack of shit who's there to ruin your post

maybe you're the rare omni-type!

[Duschia]

Even when you consider that DCNH (I thing the most 'next thing' by popular opinion) is true/useful, it actually has this bit 'people change their subtypes'. So, perhaps you can indeed be mixed subtypes at any given moment and then you sub-sub-(unsub)-type.

But is it needed or useful? I think types have considerable variation and various manifestations and I approve attempts at 'subtyping', but maybe a 'here are examples of these various manifestations and cases' should be the first step, not starting from a 'systemic' build and... Idk, kinda failing. Then build a system out of those, not theory on theory on theory.

Update: it works.

[Jarno]

We all know about subtypes, yet no one seems brave enough to go further than that. What do you think your sub-subtype is? What about your sub-sub-subtype?

I think there is no use for more detail than the two subtypes in socionics, cause instincts and tendencies are a bigger part of your personality.