Results 1 to 40 of 57

Thread: I hate socionics

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Moderator myresearch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    2,034
    Mentioned
    200 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    No worries, I was trying to half jokingly imply that whether you will get obssesed with alpha, Ne, Fe as you did with socionics while hating it. Some descriptions of types may sound more alluring at first, in reality, all types have their own vulnerabilities. Personally, I like and respect when I see types excel at what they do best however, that's not always the case. I don't like every attribute of my type or any other type, I don't know if majority of poeple feels that way or not. Keep an open mind about your type, some other type may fit you more when you get into depths of socionics or not.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    15,763
    Mentioned
    1404 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    To do lesser of typing mistakes and to trust only to classical theory may help you to like it.

    Quote Originally Posted by nice View Post
    Socionics is for housewives and homosexuals and I'm not a housewive.
    The main where it's useful is to make good pairs for long relations, as helps to take into account one of factors for friendship.
    People without homosexuality have problems to make good pairs too - they often break and it's easy to find divorces %.
    Housewives have much lesser of use, as they've made the choice of the pair already.

    Also you may add points to have F type (more Fe).
    Last edited by Sol; 07-08-2020 at 05:16 PM.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    38
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    To do lesser of typing mistakes and to trust only to classical theory may help you to like it.
    Where can I find this limited theory? Joke mode off real question.


    Quote Originally Posted by Sol View Post
    The main where it's useful is to make good pairs for long relations, as helps to take into account one of factors for friendship.
    People without homosexuality have problems to make good pairs too - they often break and it's easy to find divorces %.
    Housewives have much lesser of use, as they've made the choice of the pair already.

    Also you may add points to have F type (more Fe).
    Could actually be. I tend to like/dislike people from the get go, when I first see them. Something striking me as nice about them. Usually it's when they respond nicely to me. I try to keep good relations with everybody and I don't look down on anyone for being stupid. There is the right thing for everyone I think, equality might not be true but I like this quote:
    Let us say it once more: The only qualitative standard is the degree of more or less perfect realization of the nature proper to a person. There can be no doubt that a woman who is perfectly woman is superior to a man who is imperfectly man, just as a farmer who is faithful to his land and performs his work perfectly is superior to a king who cannot do his own work.
    So I can tolerate a lot when a person "vibes" with me in the right way. I always thought FE meant glib and over exaggerated voice modulation, but maybe I'm just thinking in stereotypes.
    who, me?

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    38
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Love yourself, not your type.
    who, me?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •