@Sol I have found you an EII :>
@Sol I have found you an EII :>
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
:/ are you autistic? Obviously I was messing with Sol...Originally Posted by Tallmo
Don't know if I am autistic or not but Obviously I was not the only one who took you literally.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
That seems to be true for the NFs in general, that sense of internal certainty or conviction. You get the sense they have strong beliefs or opinions that give them a certain force but without the tough sensibility to enforce it that the STs might have. They are extremely tough on the inside and maybe even inflexible.
Don't forget Karolina Wydra and Molly Ringwald. Two people I think are EII. Celebrities so they are easy to look up.
I meant the kind of conviction that only Fi base can produce. It's different with them. Deeply rooted.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
he's P, mb INFP
besides impressions. that messy hairstyle and a lot of redundant movements points on P
Also, would be more nice to notice EII woman on a forum
The last 2 I typed so on a forum I re-typed to other types *sad sigh*
I knew EII man on socioforum. He typed himself as EIE and flirted with LSI girl on that forum. That leaded him to heart tragedy. Though, the more tragedy would be to get long relations with supreego.
O.o but I placed the popcorn emoji and ":>" ... its kinda obvious I was messing around... e_e OP seems SEI or IEI imo. If I offended you, sry (although I doubt me saying that makes it any better)
he's P, mb INFP
besides impressions. that messy hairstyle and a lot of redundant movements points on P
Also, would be more nice to notice EII woman on a forum
The last 2 I typed so on a forum I re-typed to other types *sad sigh*
I knew EII man on socioforum. He typed himself as EIE and flirted with LSI girl on that forum. That leaded him to heart tragedy. Though, the more tragedy would be to get long relations with supreego.ppl on these forums are really really strange haha..
Last edited by SGF; 07-03-2020 at 08:28 PM.
As EII is close to the correct by my main opinion, then your joking was not bad typing appraoch.
SEI was listed as 1st by you and seems among possible still. IEI has higher chance in my perception.
Good to note, that to sensory impression may add a higher weight. S types are not common to be thin and more often have overweight due to more attention to physical needs as meal and more interest to physical work for what meaty body is better (under additional fat are often better developed muscles). Besides nonverbal behavior, how people look may mix to general impressions from them and hence N types with higher weight have additional factor of impressions to S side. With better VI skill you accent more of the attention on the behavior and such distortions on your impressions from other factors reduce.
> ppl on these forums are really really strange haha..
It was a common Internet flirt. The specific was to think someone as good pair because of types what supported the initial mutual interest and geting feelings (more by F type). In such cases it's useful to do IRL meetings sooner to understand a human better and until this to supress positive expectations (and hence feelings). Even if there are good IR indeed, - people may don't like each other by different reasons, also unknown life conditions be another obstacle for good relations.
There was a similar phenomenon in the past when people got feelings on a distance by making friendly and then flirty messages by common mailing. Internet and dating sites make this practice common. The dark side as higher risk for breaking of hearts got a mass production.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote