are there any base function subtypes that make more original things than the creative function subtypes of the same type?
it doesn't seem like it to me.
i think it's because the base function subtypes verbalize reality more while the creative function subtypes experience reality more. people who verbalize things are generally less original both verbally and when it comes to making things.
there are no subtypes in socionics
You keep saying this but I've noticed glaring differences between someone with, say, Pavarotti's inclinations in personality and myself. How do you account for that?
Originally Posted by Sol
What's the purpose of SEI?
The most creative subtypes are often the Harmonizing and the Creative subtype. The Creative subtype is creative on all levels, it can be about anything, like telling stories in a bar to unknown people. Doing random new things. The Harmonizer is good with aesthetics.
Dominants and Normalizers can also be creative people, but not by nature of their subtype like is the case with the Creative subtype.
Last edited by Tallmo; 07-31-2020 at 10:48 AM.
A true sense-perception certainly exists, but it always looks as though objects were not so much forcing their way into the subject in their own right as that the subject were seeing things quite differently, or saw quite other things than the rest of mankind. As a matter of fact, the subject perceives the same things as everybody else, only, he never stops at the purely objective effect, but concerns himself with the subjective perception released by the objective stimulus.
(Jung on Si)
the more strenght a function has - the more useful new (original) it may do