Short typing video

[Northstar]

OWNED. I’ve never seen anyone get accused for acting on video on here before. That has got to count for something. I will actually watch it later lol.

Yes, I was accused of forging my questionnaire responses too, go figure.

[sbbds]

Yes, I was accused of acting and forging my questionnaire responses too, go figure.

I wonder why!

[grumpyvic81]

Yes, I was accused of forging my questionnaire responses too, go figure.

lol and me too, like, of being an alterego of three different people so far.

Idk what that is. Something in our style being too "out of ordinary" (not outright robotic artificial tho', just...idk)?? lol

I would say the video is relatable for me. I think the same way about doing things lol.

I think you have a pretty strong stare of a kind that I'd associate with Se ego. Also there is that "coldness" that you can call Ti so beta ST ofc checks out.

Another post mentions "constricted affect". That's not totally type related but ofc it would indicate Logical type again. I would say phrasing things directly in everyday language about how one comes off easily says a lot more than astronics, lol... Anyway, to me you looked mostly focused, maybe focused on the task of doing this video lol, so it's not necessarily showing everything of how you are by default but does indicate something about your task focus. Like if that's your default then that shows a lot about you ofc. Even if you have other modes of expression and being too ofc.

Someone else mentioned their LSI friend is more responsive emotionally ("emotive"), I would say the LSI-Ti I know closely is responsive but like with very slight "expressions", he really is too low in Fe. He only gets to gain the emotional energy for a real full expression if someone has enough Fe yeah, and that doesn't happen often enough. Like, in a decade I maybe saw it happen once... Never happens around me, lol. (If I'm the only one person there. Also his family is unable to "Fe" him enough, too)

Either way, I would never say that you are LSI-Ti, you are not cold and constricted enough for LSI-Ti. You got a load of that "Ti stuff" but just not like LSI-Ti.

It's actually interesting that some of you call this acting. My understanding of IJ (especially Ti-lead) has always been that the expressivity is there under the surface, wanting to break free but held automatically in check by Ti which results in a forced lack of expression that is released when being showered by well-wishing Fe from someone. As opposed to the inexpressivity of *LI which is "more genuine" in the sense that it is not affected by Fe and doesn't mirror others.

Forced lack of expression sounds Fe HA, in my understanding Fe dual seeking isn't really forcing it, they're just oblivious/not conscious of the expressing or the lack of it.

Also "wanting to break free" sounds Fe HA again

Tho' I will admit that I sometimes experience Fe seeking that way too, like you describe it, so I don't really have a truly good solid conclusion here for you, i.e. how exactly an "ambiverted" subtype would affect this.


All in all: the very first look I had at your video I thought "SLE" but then I was not really sure anymore. I thought that instantly tho' bc of the type of stare you got. But LSI-Se can also fit Iguess. The strengthened Se creative or whatever. Also I'm absolutely sure that our way of doing Ti logic is the same fundamentally, and I type as LSI, so ...

One more thing. So I said SLE at first sight. However watching the entire video, you do look like you are very straightforward and "simple" that way, and that would be more LSI than SLE. ("Simple": I don't mean in a bad way at all. More like, emotionally not too crazy or anything, lol, and that's actually a good solid thing)

And, to me, you come off the same as in the chat. All the above descriptors (from me and others) apply to you in the chat too basically



***

yea it seemed like he was trying to act like 1d Fe

I think he was just highly focused

As far as content most of what you said you were doing came off as logics of actions information play by play.

Seemed to me just Se, "doing this, doing that", Te would be more focused on dry efficiency blah blah

So when did I piss you off, some off-hand comment or joke in the chatbox or what?

lol! Some more similarity for us bc I used to think that that sortof thing from some people was them being pissed off and hostile but it was just me not having enough experience yet with the person to figure them out/figure out their expressing. I think sbbds also likes to troll a real lot tho' it definitely can take some getting used to seeing the actual tone about her stuff.

Yeah, serves me right for talking about those boring topics.

Tbh LSI is supposed to be THE boring type. That's a big stereotype about LSI

Also, bolded an Fe HA sounding statement.

If that's Fe HA I am Fe HA too, lol. I relate 100%. Including the "optional" thing and the rest of his post there about minding it if people say the wrong thing.

[sbbds]

I love you @Tommy

the very first look I had at your video I thought "SLE"

Called it!

Will update later, but I’m sure my verdict will remain at SLE.

Jk, I know you wrote other stuff.

So I finally watched your videos @Northstar .

My first thoughts watching your initial video:
- Is he reading something off a paper?
- Does he have autism? His eyes are not moving at all lmao (actually mine are like this too at times :/)
- You seem like a nice person
- Angling his camera up makes his head shape look more rectangular and thus more like the stereotype of VI “rational”

Second video:
- You definitely seem less “rational” in this one, more extroverted, smiling, and rounded
- You look like a Caucasian gorilla
- Your hair is like a blonde q-tip and it looks soft

PS Obviously if the TOPIC you choose is mundane and boring and you just list off your daily schedule, you are gonna seem more rational. This is to viewers too; please type critically lmao. And obviously he intentionally chose stuff like that because he wants to validate his current self-typing of LSI.

Anyway I still think you are SLE. And how you come across on video is basically exactly how I imagined you would (based off chats on here and pictures you’ve posted). And I have known SLEs like you. I myself am decently close to what you’re like. In MBTI I would type you ISTX or XSTX probably, but you seem completely SLE to me in Socionics. Your actual cognition and the specifics about your motivations seem different enough on here from the more solid LSIs that you can see the difference when you read your and their content.

Also, as Tommy analyzed your emotional psyche above there, you more likely have Fi vulnerable. You clearly have some mismatch with how you think people affect you, and how they actually affect you. You seem to have a lot of difficulty with people’s attitudes towards you, wondering if they are being hostile or not. That’s exactly the stereotype of SLE and Fi polr.

You can plan a video, but you can’t plan and edit your candid interactions with people on here.