Did you read my earlier comment on this? I had mentioned how your Je was very low-key (though not as low-key as your Ji) and that there may be some leeway here.
I am still insisting on Pi lead. There is no "leap," there is exploration of options. Rest assured that my suggestions are serious.
You say you care about accuracy, but you have no qualms about leaving your type up when you don't have any in-depth understanding of the system it is referring. This is a very conflicted message.
This is straight up Te > Ti. It's a pattern I have noticed through this thread and in my interaction with you. You seek out the pragmatics of a situation. Rather than arguing the rule, you argue exceptions to the rule (such as culture and conscious choice in the moment overriding type -> these are very pragmatic stances to take that dismiss the search for the universal rule).
Even just now, in your critique of the Enneagram, you emphasize the perceived lack of scientific ground to it. You don't argue the core rules that makes up the Enneagram, but you employ the pragmatic method. It is kind of funny how your protests are only fueling my conviction of Pi>Te for your type.