...
Questionnaire
...
Last edited by panx; 04-25-2021 at 08:55 AM.
it's better to make a video
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...=1#post1096450
Last edited by Sol; 05-27-2020 at 04:56 PM.
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
@Duschia You seem likable regardless of type. I still feel like you are a young edition of @Adam Strange
LSE still works
Good Te, blah blah, also very, very Fi valuing and very Delta Fi, all that emphasis on selfless kindness and stuff
***
BTW this was interesting "Power is the ability to control and to have something under your control. I like to be in control, but I wouldn't say I'm power-hungry or something - this is a necessity to me. I have an unconscious need of 'I have to'. Maybe I should work on that further."
What is this "unconscious need of 'I have to'", got a specific example?
LSE seems right.
Why would you doubt in being LSE?
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Originally Posted by Duschia
I'm not sure why would I, but I'm not even doubting.
I think I may be trying to live beside my type/socionics, as I don't necessarily agree with many assumptions/stereotypes about my 'most possible' type.
For example, I like hugging, I like being nice (even maybe too enthusiastic sometimes - when I really like someone?) or how I'm not really conservative (in usual terms) at all, instead very liberal. I'm also willing to say 'yes, I was wrong' or 'I don't know, I'm not sure'.
I guess I would like to emphasize my individuality - me as an individual, or something. Also I like exploration like that, it's interesting to think about possibilities and directions (which can change, or result in a change). Thanks you for your support
Also someone asked me 'where is my questionnaire' and I've realized I haven't done this one; the other popular one feels too nosy to me, too much private information and maybe even too much things I may not be ready to face, as I didn't work them through
You seem like a cool dude. You remind me a bit of my brother. He is either SLI or LSE.... he's very factual and logical but loves to be physically and verbally affectionate and abuses the heart emoji in text. It sounds like you prefer "physical touch" as your primary love language just like him.
Last edited by COMEUPPANCE; 05-26-2020 at 10:54 PM.
Ned Stark is that you? Considering a lot of your thought processes are very close to mine with some key differences that point towards Te base imo you are LSE.
You come across as more diplomatic than my mental image of LSE.
"Beauty - as trying to define it - is one of many 'attitudes' a person can held towards an object.
A personal attitude is Ti approach. If you have T type, then Ti are possible too.
"Nature 'created' it as an opposite to ugliness - and what ugliness is for?"
Here you are giving not direct definition, but you input additional term and link with it. Links - is Ti region. Te think more directly.
To understand your valued functions with good assurance is possibly only by IR effects. Directly it's easier to mistake than with dichotomies.
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
Posting Permissions
