Your consensual typing of forum members

[ooo]

reyne: xLI
sol: LSI
quez: SLI (is it u from last year, u made a type me thread and I typed you SLI?)
flames: SxE
aramas: LII
faerie: xNFp
subte: LII-Ne
megat: ESI
winnie: LII-Ti
grumpy: ? (gotta study you)
consentin: SEE
adam: LIE
numbo: SLE
andreas: EII
kings: ? (gsy)
duschia: ? (gsy)
namira: Ni
freelan: ILE
grend: ILI
phi: IEI

[FreelancePoliceman]

Why ILE, @ooo?

[ooo]

'cause extroversion, participating actively in socializing in the forum, first moves; random ideas, topics, arguments all the times, curiosity; you give me an idea of activity that makes me think of extroversion (Te demo?); not particularly interested in spiritual topics for the sake of spirituality (Ni ignore); have never seen you lose your temper (Se role)

[Quez]

@ooo - I've not made a Type Me thread, so no. If you have reasoning other than merely trying to be consistent, go on.

[ooo]

ah okkk, it was weird really, i remembered this nick that I typed SLI but reading your posts lately made me scratch my head about it... ok, Ni ego probably IEI for the emotional content, but it's a shot in the dark since I know you very little

[Quez]

^

I self-type ILI, fwiw.

[Aeris]

Phi- ? (i'm sorry )

Aww, thank you for the thought.

[FreelancePoliceman]

'cause extroversion, participating actively in socializing in the forum, first moves; random ideas, topics, arguments all the times, curiosity; you give me an idea of activity that makes me think of extroversion (Te demo?); not particularly interested in spiritual topics for the sake of spirituality (Ni ignore); have never seen you lose your temper (Se role)

Isn’t Se associated with temper loss? I’d think LIIs to be generally more even-tempered than ILEs from personal experience anyway, even if they’re somewhat bitchy at times.

re. spirituality, I used to be religious, and I often feel tempted to join a religion again — convert to Islam, maybe. I can’t force myself to believe something I know can’t be true, but I feel like it’s going against my programming, in a way.

Maybe in a sense I’m extraverted. I get frustrated if over a period of time I feel I’m not affecting anything external to myself. When I’m depressed I tend to think about the uselessness of everything I do in university — doing the same work as hundreds of other students, rehashing the same arguments using the same information, etc. And I do like very much to talk to interesting people. I’m on these forums mostly from hope to read something new and interesting.

The rest of what you mentioned I’m not sure how I’d distinguish from Ne-creative.

[Ryan]

re. spirituality, I used to be religious, and I often feel tempted to join a religion again — convert to Islam, maybe. I can’t force myself to believe something I know can’t be true, but I feel like it’s going against my programming, in a way.

In what way?

[Aeris]

Aramas- Ne
flames- strong Fe
FreelancePoliceman- Alpha NT, LII-Ne > ILE
grendel- introverted T
grumpyvic81- haven't seen much yet, perhaps T
kingslayer- Ti maybe
Namira- IEI
Number 9 large- extrovert, apparant Se but where? Not LSE
ooo- Ne?
Reyne- introverted T
Subteigh- Ne, introverted
thegreenfaerie- NF, not EIE
WinnieW- LII

[FreelancePoliceman]

In what way?

It’s very hard for me to put in words. It’s probably related to growing up in a religious environment and shaping much of your early thoughts to what you’re told. Something like an urge to pray and an impulse to dedicate everything I am or do to a higher cause/deity.

[xerx]

aah, what the heck. I'm in.

[Desert Financial]

Sure. I'm interested in hearing reasoning.

[Grendel]

reyne: xLI
sol: LSI
quez: SLI (is it u from last year, u made a type me thread and I typed you SLI?)
flames: SxE
aramas: LII
faerie: xNFp
subte: LII-Ne
megat: ESI
winnie: LII-Ti
grumpy: ? (gotta study you)
consentin: SEE
adam: LIE
numbo: SLE
andreas: EII
kings: ? (gsy)
duschia: ? (gsy)
namira: Ni
freelan: ILE
grend: ILI
phi: IEI

I wanna hear more too

[Chthonic Daydream]

Put me in as well because I'm a slut.

[ooo]

Isn’t Se associated with temper loss? I’d think LIIs to be generally more even-tempered than ILEs from personal experience anyway, even if they’re somewhat bitchy at times.

re. spirituality, I used to be religious, and I often feel tempted to join a religion again — convert to Islam, maybe. I can’t force myself to believe something I know can’t be true, but I feel like it’s going against my programming, in a way.

Maybe in a sense I’m extraverted. I get frustrated if over a period of time I feel I’m not affecting anything external to myself. When I’m depressed I tend to think about the uselessness of everything I do in university — doing the same work as hundreds of other students, rehashing the same arguments using the same information, etc. And I do like very much to talk to interesting people. I’m on these forums mostly from hope to read something new and interesting.

The rest of what you mentioned I’m not sure how I’d distinguish from Ne-creative.

Se is force, a polr Se would make the use of force very sporadic, yet very improper when it happens, in my opinion, it's the achilles' heel, it can go pretty bad. also I associate introversion/extroversion to leves of activity in the outside world, and to me you seem pretty "out there", doing things, having projects, entertaining with people for the sake of conversation, also you seem more open to accept/discuss other points of views than a typical Ti would do by Ti default.

well, this is my impression, LII-Ne/ ILE/ ILI are all very similar, even EII, I think you've pondered about all of these types before, so maybe LII-Ne is your best fit for real

[ooo]

I wanna hear more too

yeah, it's an assumption honestly IDK, you give me this ILIsh vibe for some reasons I've never really pondered lots on

[BrainlessSquid]

reyne: xLI
sol: LSI
quez: SLI (is it u from last year, u made a type me thread and I typed you SLI?)
flames: SxE
aramas: LII
faerie: xNFp
subte: LII-Ne
megat: ESI
winnie: LII-Ti
grumpy: ? (gotta study you)
consentin: SEE
adam: LIE
numbo: SLE
andreas: EII
kings: ? (gsy)
duschia: ? (gsy)
namira: Ni
freelan: ILE
grend: ILI
phi: IEI

You typing me ESI is the same as saying that I typed you wrong as ILE, because you're implying that I'm your conflictor, but we're definitely not conflictors, so you must not be ILE.

[sbbds]

No means no. ;_;

[thegreenfaerie]

You typing me ESI is the same as saying that I typed you wrong as ILE, because you're implying that I'm your conflictor, but we're definitely not conflictors, so you must not be ILE.

I've been able to get along with conflictors or even be friends with some online, whether my type was IEI, EII or IEE

[BrainlessSquid]

I've been able to get along with conflictors or even be friends with some online, whether my type was IEI, EII or IEE

I know it can happen. But my Fi is good enough for me to realize that he's not a conflictor

[grumpyvic81]

Se is force, a polr Se would make the use of force very sporadic, yet very improper when it happens, in my opinion, it's the achilles' heel, it can go pretty bad. also I associate introversion/extroversion to leves of activity in the outside world, and to me you seem pretty "out there", doing things, having projects, entertaining with people for the sake of conversation, also you seem more open to accept/discuss other points of views than a typical Ti would do by Ti default.

well, this is my impression, LII-Ne/ ILE/ ILI are all very similar, even EII, I think you've pondered about all of these types before, so maybe LII-Ne is your best fit for real

This is actually a very good point. @FreelancePoliceman this is what I meant by your intuitive vibes. That you are open to accept/discuss other points of views. LII-Ne's are decently open but you are more open than the average LII-Ne. You still come off as an introvert so I don't think ILE though

You are also a lot like this person @bethanyrose who I talked to in their intro thread.


Edit: Also ooo I think ESI works for you. Let me know when you got to study me enough lol

[flames]

Aramas LSE
flames SEI
grumpyvic81 ESE
Number 9 large SLI
ooo ILE
Reyne SLI
Subteigh SEE
thegreenfaerie EII
WinnieW SLE

Well, SEI is a new one. Should I bake you a cake?

[flames]

reyne: xLI
sol: LSI
quez: SLI (is it u from last year, u made a type me thread and I typed you SLI?)
flames: SxE
aramas: LII
faerie: xNFp
subte: LII-Ne
megat: ESI
winnie: LII-Ti
grumpy: ? (gotta study you)
consentin: SEE
adam: LIE
numbo: SLE
andreas: EII
kings: ? (gsy)
duschia: ? (gsy)
namira: Ni
freelan: ILE
grend: ILI
phi: IEI

SLE

[flames]

Just a casual reminder that I like it rough, everyone.

Aramas: EII-Fi
Baboooshka: IEE-Ne
flames: Irreplaceable
FreelancePoliceman: LII-Ne
Grendel: ILE-Ne
grumpyvic81
kingslayer: SLE-Ti
My Chemical Bromance: LSI-Se
Namira
Number 9 large: SLE-Se
ooo: IEE-Fi
phi: IEI-Fe
Reyne: ESI-Se
Subteigh: EII-Ne
thegreenfaerie: IEE-Fi (I see us as having equal strengths running in opposite directions, quasi-identical is a logical conclusion)
WinnieW: LII-Ne

[WinnieW]

WinnieW SLE

Looks like you have the impression that I'm successful to force other people to adopt my logical system.

[Quez]

I'll do it -greenfaerie, bouncingoffclouds

SEE

[grumpyvic81]

Looks like you have the impression that I'm successful to force other people to adopt my logical system.

Thought that was LSI

[WinnieW]

Thought that was LSI

You noticed the weakness of my argument. Congrats, pal. But I wasn't meant seriously at all.

[WinnieW]

***

[Bethanyclaire]

This is actually a very good point. @FreelancePoliceman this is what I meant by your intuitive vibes. That you are open to accept/discuss other points of views. LII-Ne's are decently open but you are more open than the average LII-Ne. You still come off as an introvert so I don't think ILE though

You are also a lot like this person @bethanyrose who I talked to in their intro thread.


Edit: Also ooo I think ESI works for you. Let me know when you got to study me enough lol

Maybe they're IEI then I am IEI (for sure) but can be a bit like an IEE. Types acting like other types is weird but cool/ cool but weird haha

[ApeironStella]

Sure, why not?

[kingslayer]

@kingslayer

cool, idk what to type u, we havent interacted ever before and i miss to read ur posts in the serious threads on typology eheheh, sorry but not going there lately.. btw, flattered to be someone's dual do you have any reasoning for typing me IEI?

Haha no worries. Its just a vague impression off of forum posts.. im not sure how to explain it but since I have met many IEIs I know that "feeling" that I personally get when I'm around them.. or in this case reading forum posts

[flames]

No means no. ;_;

S
L
E

[silke]

opting in @inaLim

[Kernel]

This list has only the ppl who I have seen their questionnaire or more than few posts. So these are my typings for now:

Aramas - you seem logical. At first I was unsure between LII and a Te ego type, after reading more your posts I got Fi/Te valuing vibe, so probably Te ego and Gamma NT > Delta ST.
Baboooshka - IEI-Fe.
flames - SEE > EIE.
FreelancePoliceman - LII.
grumpyvic81 - you kinda seem more extroverted than LSIs, in the way that you are not as dry as them. SLE? But it could be a subtype thing.
Number 9 large - SEE.
ooo - Fe creative. IEI or SEI.
phi - IEI.
Reyne - ESI-Fi.
Subteigh - LII or beta NF.
thegreenfaerie - IEE
xerxe - seems Si/Ne valuing.

[inaLim]

opting in @inaLim

It's a mixture of setting short-range goals, moving from past to the future that those are at least somewhere in the range of what I want to achieve, with periodic switches to a thoughtless state of random sensory perceptions like listening to a plane flying overhead or watching the clouds pass by or grass waving around in the sunlight, and the neverending conflict between the stuff I've learned from various lectures and podcasts and the world that I can observe around me, which on a rare occasion will click together in cohesion but most often it leaves a kind of tangled mess due to unresolved contradictions.

SF? (Alpha > Gamma)

Do you have a typeme thread you wanted me to look at? That's all I saw from you

[silke]

SF? (Alpha > Gamma)

Do you have a typeme thread you wanted me to look at? That's all I saw from you

Ah, you're not the person I've meant to summon. Must have had another tab open and confused you for making this thread. Which could be type related.. ...

I don't have a typeme thread, as those feel too artificial.
@Reyne add me to the list

[grumpyvic81]

Baboooshka - INFx (IEI-Fe works)
Duschia - LSE
flames - SEE
FreelancePoliceman - LII (forget IEI)
Grendel - ILE
Reyne - ESI
ooo - ESI
sbbds - SLI?
thegreenfaerie - ExI?

[Number 9 large]

Interesting to see that of 9 people typing I received 0 Fe typings ahahahahahahahaha

I'm chill with all the SLI and ESI typings. They both make sense, considering I'm a FiSi/SiFi in jungian terms. At that point it's just a matter of socionics interpretation of the various users. I may take Nietzsche as an example. Jung considered him to be a NiTi (and I agree with him). In the socionics typing thread he may be typed as IEI-Ni (I would type him this way if forced to use socionics as a system), or ILI (which would make more sense in terms of strong functions, but less sense in terms of valued ones). I want to add that I share Jung's position regarding the fact that introverts got no conscious extroverted functions.

In my case SLI-Si, EII-Fi, ESI and SEI would be the remaining possible types.

Knowing the nature of the socionics system, typing myself as a Fe creative would be outrageous. Out of the three remaining types they all sound good, and make sense depending on who's typing me. As I already stated, I put a higher importance to the concept of value of the functions, so out of these three options ESI is the least favorite, but knowing other people use different interpretations of these systems, I'm fine with it. Also because it's still in my top three, and it's not like they're typing me ESE (I didn't choose ESE as an example because it's a bad type, but because it's a distant type from my personality).

I was recently thinking maybe SEE-Fi works too. Just my 2 cents