Video trying to define an idea - what do I come off as?

[guac]

Yeah, is definitely Ni/Se
the way you see things, you are trying to converge on one ultimate idea/understanding of something.
and the beginning, when you take your glasses off.. how do i say it. when i've filmed things with my friends, they don't think about stuff like that and just go and say/do what they are supposed to for the video, they are rooted in the moment of what's happening. in contrast i am already thinking about how i see the end-product, and what impression it needs to make, so i am more particular on things that are along the same vein of you wanting us to be able to see your eyebrows while you speak. (because it is important, your goal is to impart a certain understanding and impression on us viewers, and everything in the video needs to be aligned towards that)

[Kill4Me]

EII-Fi is your correct typing.

EIE-Ni, no way.

[guac]

EII-Fi is your correct typing.

EIE-Ni, no way.

No, where do you see Fi?

[rexsaurus36]

EII-Fi is your correct typing.

EIE-Ni, no way.

I think it's very unlikely that Se is a place of least resistance. Perhaps IEI-Ni or ILI-Ni is more likely than LII or EII, just from what I know about Model A.

[guac]

I think it's very unlikely that Se is a place of least resistance. Perhaps IEI-Ni or ILI-Ni is more likely than LII or EII, just from what I know about Model A.

take all this with a grain of salt:
being IEI-Ni, I very highly doubt you are one. on camera, my Fe still leaks out so much. you have none of that. and i just don't see a lot of myself in you.

ILI-Ni actually could be a possibility.. now that i think of it you do remind of my ILI-Ni father a bit. you both have that awkwardness in presenting. and you both keep repeating "right?" when you present

maybe if you could post a video of you interacting with someone else. anyway, do you know your enneatype/instinctual stacking?

I know a few EIIs and although they seems inhibited irl/on camera, they still possess a smoothness you don't have.

[rexsaurus36]

take all this with a grain of salt:
being IEI-Ni, I very highly doubt you are one. on camera, my Fe still leaks out so much. you have none of that. and i just don't see a lot of myself in you.

ILI-Ni actually could be a possibility.. now that i think of it you do remind of my ILI-Ni father a bit. you both have that awkwardness in presenting. and you both keep repeating "right?" when you present

maybe if you could post a video of you interacting with someone else. anyway, do you know your enneatype/instinctual stacking?

I know a few EIIs and although they seems inhibited irl/on camera, they still possess a smoothness you don't have.

I'm fairly sure that I am 5w4 so/sp, 538 tritype.

[Kill4Me]

I'm sure your type is EII-Fi and not ILI.

The presentation of your definition of an idea is too non-commital and convoluted for NiTe. Your language is imprecise and tangential. It lacks the quality of inner knowing and intuition counter to the mainstream; the dismissive nature in which Ni-lead can argue for a baseless position even in the face of clearly contradictory evidence...which is intrinsic to Ni-lead. Ne-lead does some of that too.

Either way, these are clear-cut disqualifiers for ILI and Ni-ego.

Furthermore, I can just tell that you would get "mowed down" in a debate with either an ILI or LII on what the definition of an idea is (or any topic in which we can find an ILI/LII who matched your interests)...if you were an ILI I would not be getting that sense.

[Ryan]

Furthermore, I can just tell that you would get "mowed down" in a debate with either an ILI or LII on what the definition of an idea is (or any topic in which we can find an ILI/LII who matched your interests)...if you were an ILI I would not be getting that sense.

Anyone would get "mowed down" in a debate at that age. How is this a serious argument..

@safsom2 don't worry about getting typed, get to know yourself. You are too young to have explored every facet of your personality. You haven't experienced much.

Focus on what you are looking for in this theory and ignore the rest. Don't get caught up with useless stuff.

[rexsaurus36]

I'm sure your type is EII-Fi and not ILI.

The presentation of your definition of an idea is too non-commital and convoluted for NiTe. Your language is imprecise and tangential. It lacks the quality of inner knowing and intuition counter to the mainstream; the dismissive nature in which Ni-lead can argue for a baseless position even in the face of clearly contradictory evidence...which is intrinsic to Ni-lead. Ne-lead does some of that too.

Either way, these are clear-cut disqualifiers for ILI and Ni-ego.

Furthermore, I can just tell that you would get "mowed down" in a debate with either an ILI or LII on what the definition of an idea is (or any topic in which we can find an ILI/LII who matched your interests)...if you were an ILI I would not be getting that sense.

This isn't a formal argument, it was a typing video. Which means what I was saying was partially true, but partially also bullshit strewn up on the spot. What was imprecise about the language? I am sure I could systematize it if you were to give me words to work with and construct a coherent argument with; I am perfectly able to. If you would like to engage in an actual debate to practice arguing, I am more than happy to.

[Rusal]

the way you see things, you are trying to converge on one ultimate idea/understanding of something.
and the beginning, when you take your glasses off.. how do i say it. when i've filmed things with my friends, they don't think about stuff like that and just go and say/do what they are supposed to for the video, they are rooted in the moment of what's happening. in contrast i am already thinking about how i see the end-product, and what impression it needs to make, so i am more particular on things that are along the same vein of you wanting us to be able to see your eyebrows while you speak. (because it is important, your goal is to impart a certain understanding and impression on us viewers, and everything in the video needs to be aligned towards that)

A bit of a derail here, but worrying about the 'experience' you're providing other people in a visual presentation and the impression it's going to make can be argued to be Si+Fe rather than Ni.

[guac]

A bit of a derail here, but worrying about the 'experience' you're providing other people in a visual presentation and the impression it's going to make can be argued to be Si+Fe rather than Ni.

It's not just any experience, it's a strong focus on every aspect of the video to cause ONE specific impression.
Anyway, you are probably right too. who knows

[grumpyvic81]

It's not just any experience, it's a strong focus on every aspect of the video to cause ONE specific impression.
Anyway, you are probably right too. who knows

Consider ESI for that, that sounds really Ne PoLR-ish for the Ni focus and it would explain the high SF aspect the other poster pointed out.