Hi! I'm here to investigate more about visual typing, I'm fascinated about how it's possible. I'm looking forward to some good discussion.
Hi! I'm here to investigate more about visual typing, I'm fascinated about how it's possible. I'm looking forward to some good discussion.
Hi,
So basically people of the same type have a similar look but since people are evolving I find that often a new look of a particular type emerges and I have to catalog it as to keep track of that
I am INFJ/EII and I was taught this by the best of Russian Socioncis teachers like Antonina Volkova a professor or Humanities in St Petersburg University
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Interesting. So the types do have a genetic basis! Wow! I certainly do want to investigate this further... I've taken a questionnaire already and I'm interested in how I might be typed based on pictures I'm going to post / a questionnaire I'm answering at the moment.
Part of me wants to believe that a person's genetics has no effect on their cognition. That anyone can think how they want to think, in a process that they themselves design. But it's also beautiful to me how there might be an order to how people perceive / think about things. Makes me want to break it
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I held on to the irrational belief that people don't have a set-in-stone cognitive nature and could shape themselves to fundamentally change, almost morph into other people, people they wanted to be. Transformation. But I always suspected that genetics disagreed with me there, and it does. I'm not so much surprised, I'd say more disappointed tbh.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
If you want to start with EII here are three on YouTube..you can notice eyes, general facial expressions, their posture etc...
Myself "Maritsa for Socionics"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xl3CE_Kv2xs&t=15s
This lovely lady
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7uR9wBbgi8&t=117s
This gentleman
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrfQBQvMDyw
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html