Results 1 to 40 of 42

Thread: SLE males and prison

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    EII typed by Gulenko
    Posts
    4,671
    Mentioned
    339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by timber View Post
    Evolutionary biology and behavioural psychology have been bed fellows for decades. AKA: your genes make you behave x way. Its form of scientific material reductionism and branch of atheism. We are just chemicals acting out of a machine without purpose, meaning, direction, all occurring by chance in a cold empty universe. Our intelligence is simply a function of our large brains that mysteriously evolved to fill and niche and now we are destroying our habitat and headed for annihilation. All altruism is a by-product of tit-for tat principles and spirituality is a collateral ghost, something to be overcome by rationality and logic. The superstitious are weak minded and the Third-person objective narrator is the only one to be trusted as real.

    Fun isn't it? This is the new modality for present modern cosmology.
    What is your point then? Do you think aliens or your third eye make you gay?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    2,035
    Mentioned
    53 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sbbds View Post
    What is your point then? Do you think aliens or your third eye make you gay?

    Its just because I can be. Maybe even a malfunctioning unit. This is the inherent conclusion of genes controlling behaviour. Unless you can come up with the positive versions, like Gay uncle theory or some other primitive behavioural psychology assumption that sounds neato in computer simulations.

  3. #3
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    EII typed by Gulenko
    Posts
    4,671
    Mentioned
    339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by timber View Post
    Its just because I can be. Maybe even a malfunctioning unit. This is the inherent conclusion of genes controlling behaviour. Unless you can come up with the positive versions, like Gay uncle theory or some other primitive behavioural psychology assumption that sounds neato in computer simulations.
    What you’re proposing is that it’s just random then, right? That’s great and all, but also too bad because science has reported at least one clear trend here, in that article, where it’s not just random. You can’t turn your nose up to the facts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •