@Itsme Racial markers only make up a tiny part of genetic makeup, dum dum
You could very likely be genetically closer to Lil Wayne than to your vanillaface honkey neighbor next door
@Itsme Racial markers only make up a tiny part of genetic makeup, dum dum
You could very likely be genetically closer to Lil Wayne than to your vanillaface honkey neighbor next door
Yeah, go on acting from above while arguing like a fourth grader.
What you are saying is not relevant at all.
There are proven Differences in all those Areas and those Areas matter a lot.
It's not your people being genocided so please understand that i am a little bit more bothered by those things than you may are.
Lol
It’s relevant because you’re making arguments about race based on genetic distance, when there is less genetic differentiation between races (entire races being bigger pool averages of humanity of course) than there is between individuals within the same respective individual race.
I guess you consider your fear of white people being killed to be rational and mature and adult then.
No, it was some Ti bullshit-deductive logic trying to relativize the objective differences that have been proven.
If she was LSI i would understand her being Te ignoring but she is supposed to have it as a demonstrative so why should you let count something on the level of a Ti hidden agenda of a Te-Polr in regrard to actually existing information.
If it has been proven that 2+2=4 you don't need anybody to say that this does not matter because in logical system XY someone says that x equates to b if l = 5
Its just bullshit, nothing more, nothing less.
Last edited by Itsme; 08-07-2020 at 06:49 AM.
l
I was about to point out that Ni allows me to wonder instantly about cause and effect and to see the language of symbols...It also helps me to pay attention to the inability for the studies that Itsme is referencing to show genetics (not enslavement and broad subjugation of peoples for half a millennia) are the actual root of test score differences between races. It's just basic science that you can't make a determination about a variable when you aren't holding other variables steady across the control as well, and those studies didn't study samples which survived the same resource inequities from all 'races'. Lenore of the greenlightwiki had great descriptions of Ni as an info element. It's not 'in the box' thinking, nor outside the box thinking but more analysing the box thinking.
Itsme may be any type. But, I was taken aback at the acceptance of such a demonstrably dubious and highly simplistic conclusion, so I did have a thought just now that Itsme might not be LIE. It may be a lack of opportunity when it comes to experience and certain venues of education and training. That can be accessed in future, though. Itsme isn't stuck.
Wow race is a continuum and not a 1 or 0 switch. i am totally flashed. Its almost like people have more than 1 gene that determines who they are...
Yes there is also so much difference between individual intelligence that there are black individuals smarter than white individuals, still does not change anything about the majority of people.”Ultimately, there is so much ambiguity between the races, and so much variation within them, that two people of European descent may be more genetically similar to an Asian person than they are to each other (Figure 2).”
I've provided so many sources proving what I'm saying.
It is everywhere, show me all those black scientists and philosophers, i don't want to repeat myself for the thousandth time. Ignoring those facts will not lead to anything good but repeating what i already said here for so many times is just a waste of energy.
Here, again an article stating the obvious which everyone who is not completely brainwashed and can put together with basic biological knowledge spelled out for you, even though it is a waste of energy.
https://www.livescience.com/29390-al...ancestors.html
Another source: https://psmag.com/news/authoritarian...trump-triggers, this time it's related to Haidt's research.
On the threat of multiculturalism:
"The things that multiculturalists believe will help people appreciate and thrive in democracy—appreciating difference, talking about difference, displaying and applauding difference—are the very conditions that encourage authoritarians not to heights of tolerance, but to their intolerant extremes," they write.
On the differences between conservatives and authoritarians, and why conservatives are amenable to democracy, very concisely put:
You can think of status quo conservatism as an aversion to difference over time (things being changeable, unsettled, or uncertain), as opposed to authoritarianism, which is an aversion to difference across space (things being complex, varied, or disordered). This distinction matters for the preservation of liberal democracy, because status-quo conservatives will be inclined to defend and preserve an established regime of diversity and freedom, so long as it is authoritatively supported, institutionally entrenched, consensually accepted, and a source of social stability.
I have always suspected that the economic argument against immigration is bunk, and so do they:
My strong sense from the best available evidence is that fears around racial identity/race relations/immigration, moral permissiveness/”moral decay,” political conflict/dissent, etc., are sometimes displaced onto, or expressed as, economic fears.
According to the source, more democracy makes these people less reassured, not more. The United States just happens to be one of the most democratic countries in history, wherein even Sheriffs are elected.
A large part of the problem is that America actually has too much democracy for the tastes of a third of its population. Consider there are three separate branches of government purposely set in permanent opposition to one another. The U.S., of course, also has many levels of government, with voters passing judgment on all, from the president right down to the school board and dog catcher. Thus, there are constant demands for electoral participation and endless exposure to political debate, dispute, and conflict. This is indeed a vibrant democracy, but you have to understand it is simultaneously, for the same reasons, anathema to authoritarians.