Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Can logical types be 4's ?

  1. #1
    mclane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    TIM
    LIE-Ni
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Can logical types be 4's ?

    Say yes or no and why, and post examples if you have any.

  2. #2
    Number 9 large's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Baking bread
    TIM
    ESTp 7w8 Aries Sp/Sx
    Posts
    4,393
    Mentioned
    244 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    no. image types are clearly correlated to feeler types.

  3. #3
    Dauphin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    North Carolina
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    946
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If one wishes to make a perfectly consistent pan-systemic form of typology, then no, logical types can't be 4s. Otherwise, does it matter?

    I've seen Leonard Cohen typed as SLI and Kafka typed as ILI, and they're both probable 4s. There are other likely typings, but it's something to consider.

  4. #4
    Heaven and Hell Samson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    TIM
    LSI
    Posts
    451
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Being a Logical type does not preclude one from having a fixation in image.


  5. #5
    Seed my wickedness Existential Ibuprofen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Spontaneous Human Combustion
    TIM
    ILE LEVF/#unfit4lyfe
    Posts
    7,084
    Mentioned
    305 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think I'd type myself as 7+4i (type 7 with 4 as the imaginary component). Lol, I think this complex imaginary plane is simply the best addition to the enneagram developed by WinnieW and me (far exceeds wings, tritypes and integrations). In my case own fixation generates unique image.
    MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
    Winning is for losers

     

    Sincerely yours,
    idiosyncratic type
    Life is a joke but do you have a life?

  6. #6
    No name's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    The hot humid south
    TIM
    6w7 612
    Posts
    46
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What do you mean by "logical"?
    They have T in their type, that they can be reasonable, or that they rely solely on data for decision making?
    If you mean, are there any that only rely on logic? My answer is no. Do they at times, they rely on logic? Yes. But most likely it would be surrounding topics that don't involve the heart. I would say sp 4w5 would be the best at it though.

  7. #7
    FreelancePoliceman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    4,006
    Mentioned
    367 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think my E-type is 5w4, and people seem to think I'm LII. So I'm almost an example of one.
    φιλοκαλοῦμέν τε γὰρ μετ᾽ εὐτελείας καὶ φιλοσοφοῦμεν ἄνευ μαλακίας...

    I've been busy, so if I don't respond to something, feel free to ping me every day or so until I do.

  8. #8
    mclane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    TIM
    LIE-Ni
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by No name View Post
    What do you mean by "logical"?
    They have T in their type, that they can be reasonable, or that they rely solely on data for decision making?
    If you mean, are there any that only rely on logic? My answer is no. Do they at times, they rely on logic? Yes. But most likely it would be surrounding topics that don't involve the heart. I would say sp 4w5 would be the best at it though.
    Types with logic on ego block (socionics).

  9. #9
    voider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    TIM
    SEE-H 2w3 so/sx
    Posts
    640
    Mentioned
    78 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There can't really be full causation between the two systems imo. One deals with personal fixations the other deals with cognition and ability to process different types of information - which, of course will definitely affect correlation and skew people into thinking that these two systems are fully connected. But enneagram doesn't infer ability, merely points to places in which we hurt. I don't see how that points to a 100% correlation between socionics and enneagram, because people are so varied, there'll be times when a 4 is a logical type. As with all other combinations... Although some may well be more impossible than others, like 8 EII (more likely to actually be a disintegrated 2).That being said, I agree with the previously mentioned 4w5 sp being the most likely logical contender.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •