I don’t think it’s exactly Se because it uses too many Ne-like metaphors (“hair spread out like angel wings”) instead of just clearly and concretely describing the damn thing and one’s own attraction. The second part might be an accurate representation of how Ni leading types feel but idk.
it is. it came from SLE friendOriginally Posted by sbbds
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
It’s very heavy Ne role if it is. In any case I don’t find it very compelling or a good example of more raw Se. It’s also low quality writing.
It probably isn't, can't trust a typing from a pelican.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
