voider's questionnaire

[voider]

@mclane besides, I don't know if there's evidence of J in my questionnaire. Is there?

[mclane]

@mclane besides, I don't know if there's evidence of J in my questionnaire. Is there?

Not particularly. You might be DCNH N though.

What you describe seems more consistent with SEE-Se.

[voider]

Not particularly. You might be DCNH N though.

What you describe seems more consistent with SEE-Se.

I was thinking DNCH N fits me most, but how is it that I'm SEE-Se and also N when N is Fi? I guess if you look at them separately it all makes perfect sense, if you look at them both together, it also makes sense that I feel like I'm actually very contradictory. That's why I've been having trouble with the subtype. I wonder if the normalizing has to do with how I was raised, and the Se is just how I am without that external influence. But then, who I am I if not my response to the external influence?

[voider]

SEE-Se: Se, Ti, Te, Si

Normalizing: Ti, Si,Fi

Dominant: Te, Se, Fe

It'd still make sense if you are Normalizing. Generally speaking, your Fi and Fe would just not be as strengthened.

Hmm, I guess that might make sense. But laid out like this, I'd say I relate to Dominant more - and it checked out with the tests I took. The problem is my behavior, which makes me doubtful of Dominant, because I do not identify with the bull-on-rampage type of thing except when I'm working. Usually I'm less controlling, I think........ I think. That, and the fact that I'm not an extreme extrovert, which some accentuated introverted functions would explain. In what world is my Ti accentuated though?

[Sol]

I recommend to look at Ni betas and gammas in my blogger's list.
Mb you'll notice who you like more and that will fit to SLE.

forget about baseless heretic fantasies as subtypes
also to make a video would be second useful your act

[voider]

I recommend to look at Ni betas and gammas in my blogger's list.
Mb you'll notice who you like more and that will fit to SLE.

forget about baseless heretic fantasies as subtypes
also to make a video would be second useful your act

I genuinely do not see in what world I value Ti. You're the one making baseless heretic claims. I'd give your opinion merit if only you used actual, factual information for once, like the Te dom you claim to be. But you don't. (+ basing someone's typing on who they say they like, which is something influenced in large part by momentary whim, may be the worst typing method I've witnessed to date.)

[Alonzo]

Hmm, I guess that might make sense. But laid out like this, I'd say I relate to Dominant more - and it checked out with the tests I took. The problem is my behavior, which makes me doubtful of Dominant, because I do not identify with the bull-on-rampage type of thing except when I'm working. Usually I'm less controlling, I think........ I think. That, and the fact that I'm not an extreme extrovert, which some accentuated introverted functions would explain. In what world is my Ti accentuated though?

Just curious, but what would you consider to be an extreme extrovert?

[voider]

@flames Ah thank you so much for the response!! I'm glad you see me that way - and it makes sense about 6 and 2. Lately they're pretty tied on the top. I'm curious, how do you see me fetishizing Te?