Yes; I tend to assume that they know themselves best.
No; my knowledge and observation capability allow me to notice that many of them are mistyped.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm not sure whether or not Ijs would be any more self-involved than other types. I refer to their thinking processes. They rationalize 'static' (removed from the environment and stored) information at a distance because they have to remove themselves from the fray in order to think properly - thinking on their feet really isn't their thing. By static, I also imply that they turn off input when they rationalize. This detachment of rationalization from information processes permits them a more objective view of even information about themselves. Now, Eps have a similar detachment but their input focus often causes them to cut-off or ignore their rationalization so although some my get clear images of themselves, they're less likely to draw valid conclusions........
a.k.a. I/O