View Poll Results: Do you generally trust people's self typings?

Voters
13. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes; I tend to assume that they know themselves best.

    8 61.54%
  • No; my knowledge and observation capability allow me to notice that many of them are mistyped.

    5 38.46%
Results 1 to 29 of 29

Thread: Do you trust people's self-typings?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,953
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rebelondeck View Post
    Many seem to view themselves as the types they want (or are expected) to be rather than who they really are; in work performance reviews, many are surprised by how their behaviour and abilities are really perceived by others. Few people seem to be able to take truly objective looks at themselves and or their situations. Ijs tend to be slightly better at it than other types provided they have no other overriding issues. Three out of four who have actually typed themselves seem to question it for some reason or another so I've preferred to make my own determinations.......

    a.k.a. I/O
    Ij tend to be self reflective also self involved
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  2. #2
    Rebelondeck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    1,929
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beautiful sky View Post
    Ij tend to be self reflective also self involved
    I'm not sure whether or not Ijs would be any more self-involved than other types. I refer to their thinking processes. They rationalize 'static' (removed from the environment and stored) information at a distance because they have to remove themselves from the fray in order to think properly - thinking on their feet really isn't their thing. By static, I also imply that they turn off input when they rationalize. This detachment of rationalization from information processes permits them a more objective view of even information about themselves. Now, Eps have a similar detachment but their input focus often causes them to cut-off or ignore their rationalization so although some my get clear images of themselves, they're less likely to draw valid conclusions........

    a.k.a. I/O

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •