Or if not, why you think I’m something else
Or if not, why you think I’m something else
Generally speaking, I'm partial to all Se "aggressor" types--I always know when one is in the room, especially Se dominants. SLEs (particularly enneagram 7w8s and 8w7s) tend to strike (impress upon) me in a way that immediately registers as blunt force trauma. Lol Personally, I think it's kinda adorable (in that 'power' can be hot) and amusing. What comes through strongly and clearly from you is that Se impact in much of what you say--vivid, explicit, concrete, forceful. You do make use of your Ne role (especally in your 'takedowns') but it definitely takes a back seat to Se base.
And I always find your arguments to be internally consistent--you certainly are not Ti PoLR. You also seem to be fairly good at exploiting logical loopholes in others' arguments. This, in combination with 2D Fe, would mean that the troll force should be strong in you...and it is. Lol And even when you do manifest an Fe concern for harmony (e.g. sticking up for 'the little guys'), it's still sublimated to a forceful Se program that makes the Fe come off a little rough around the edges. Your usage of Fe is not soft, fluffy and delicate. It's more akin to tough/rough love.
To me, you're clearly SLE.![]()
^ What he said.
EII-D-Se 8w7 7w8 3w2
EII-D from Gulenko:
Humanist – Consistent
Prototype: Volunteer for charitable organization (consistent with your education, right?)
Nah, I have seen few SLE's like you.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
NO Private messages, please. Use Discord instead.
I don’t know if you are but this far you are not rude so that indicates to me Beta ST language of niceness
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
you have evident F type
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
To be or not to be – EIE. QED
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
NO Private messages, please. Use Discord instead.
i think you are way too emotional to be a t type tbh
I like SLE for you, I can’t think of any particular reasons but I can’t think of many reasons why not either so take that how you want. One thing I’ll say is Fe valuing is clear. Everyone is emotional.
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
Cuz you're me but with tits and less filter
I thought fresh meat was a dude, lmao
What’s the alternative?
I thought this was a joke post. 2nd everything @Alonzo said.
To add a more subjective perspective - Your kind of vibe is relaxing (to me). You're definitely someone I can escalate with. I would be surprised if we're not in the same quadra or at least look-a-likes. The directness of your crudeness reminds me of LSI women, but you're an attention whore and I don't sense much difference in our cognitive styles. You're not a dude so there's less reason to suspect you're a SF/NF overcompensating by being blunt & provocative. I don't get the sense you're a Fi type roleplaying SLE to identify with "Marshall". I can't say the same for a couple of the other people I've seen active tagged with SLE.
So I would say SLE > LSI > SEE. This is just based off what I've read by you and a couple interactions in shout. The only thing that gives me pause is we seem to have pretty different ideas of who our duals are. I haven't seen a vid of you yet so I would not at all be surprised if you turn out some rational skank.
@inaLim Wow lol.
...
Wouldnt it harden them?
Hardness is nerve tone & how "dry" you are. So unless you plan on taking steroids, eliminating carbs & salt from your diet, and drying yourself out like jerky, your ass will be as soft as a cotton candy pillow.
Now if I thought you were a Te dom or ILI I wouldn't even bring it up because those fuckers can get obsessed with the Te improvements and go off the rails. You'll know when enough is enough. It takes more than 6 months, and consistency. Its not like you're gonna fuck around and wake up a she-hulk.
But why listen to me when you could just see with your eyes
https://www.reddit.com/r/xxfitness/c...o_to_an_asian/
This chick did a different exercise but its the same physics
https://www.reddit.com/r/xxfitness/c...booty_edition/
What other type did you think you were btw?
Umm...no. Her "defensiveness," which I read as mild annoyance and frustration, is born from people saying shit that doesn't make sense (and is therefore unhelpful), which can be a source of irritation for logical types.
First off, her personality on this forum is only an aspect, a limited, potentially deliberate showcasing of a part of who she is; being "too emotional" in this space would not necessarily mean that she spends the bulk of her day/time/life making decisions based off of feeling--it's only what you see.
Furthermore, what constitutes being "too emotional" is not only relative (seeing as how everyone possesses emotion to varying extents and degrees) but wasn't adequately defined by you. And who is to say that you competently and accurately know how to decipher what it is you believe that you are perceiving? Because if "too emotional to be a t type" is the extent of your analysis, then you were understandably and justifiably mocked.
Lastly, how emotional you think she is ultimately doesn't matter. What matters is whether or not she possesses the scope and dimensionality assigned to the functions that belong to her purported type. If she is a F type, then point out her high D Fe and Fi.
Well you liked me and thought I was SLE in my type me thread, so bonus points to you!
But, seriously. Not too sure why but you deff seem SE base, whether it's backed by ti or fi I'm not too sure, but you do seem rather logical. SE-TI Could work
IEI
@Alonzo People on here rarely listen to maniac anyway, and for good reason. But it’s okay, thanks for defending me.
I want to see more just what people use as their reasoning, and to get people more in the mindset of providing reasons in general. This is really what people should be doing in every thread, instead of just jerking out a comment and leaving with no explanation.
HOW you think being of higher quality is a precursor to WHAT you think being of higher accuracy too.
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
"what is my type"
gets unwanted opinion-> has to get random person defending her cause she can't defend herself
now tell me whats the point of making a thread like this if you're going to reject every opinion someone gives you? lol
You are obviously Te polr lol, every comment here is completely inaccurate.
I didn’t reject your comment at all. I just gave you the conditions for ensuring its logical consistency.
And I already replied to you anyway. You are the one who’s calling it defensive, not me. Pray tell why you think your comments might need defending against if they are not meant to be inflammatory?
And Alonzo randomly decided to defend me on his own, obviously lol. I didn’t “get him” to do anything.