-
SEI
ESE
ILE
LII
IEI
EIE
SLE
LSI
ILI
LIE
SEE
ESI
SLI
LSE
IEE
EII
-
Last edited by toska; 08-11-2021 at 10:39 PM.
video
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
Well you do look for work ethics and energy/quality in others so I take it Te seeking
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I relate to this a lot “How do you behave around strangers?
Quiet, reserved. I’m either friendly and warm or totally closed off.”
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
One giant thing to consider... maybe two giant things 1. EII are very sparse with their words and 2. You seem to me very categorical![]()
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
So you are saying your parents are conflictors. Are you sure you have typed them correctly?
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Something felt IEI-ish at first, but I'm fully convinced of EII now. Maybe it's just that I have this mental image that EIIs are supposed to be lame or awkward or something.I think that your mom wants to direct you to goals seems kinda Te, but then it could really be Ni plus you said she's enthusiastic which I'm sure is her Fe. That your dad is sort of the opposite seems atypical of Te, but that could also just be his Si relaxation, or whatever. I didn't read all of it, because obligatory ADHD excuse, but I was very interested and I'll probably come back to it later.
I think there's definitely hints of Te and Si seeking in there, and seeming aloof and being selective with friends is very Fe ignoring + Fi. Also Fi with conflict resolution.
Final typing: EII!![]()
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
Totally convinced go for it good luck in life
Btw you should be totally impressed that Maritsa gave you the EII seal of approval lmao. Usually she tries to violently destroy anyone who dares to type as EII.![]()
・゚*✧ 𝓘 𝓌𝒾𝓁𝓁 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒶𝒸𝒸𝑒𝓅𝓉 𝒶 𝓁𝒾𝒻𝑒 𝓘 𝒹𝑜 𝓃𝑜𝓉 𝒹𝑒𝓈𝑒𝓇𝓋𝑒 ✧*:・゚
"Sensitive but not moody" sounds like a very Fi thing, so I agree with EII. I'm both.
I think you are a bit different than some EIIs tho cuz a lot of EIIs are enneagram 1 but you being a 4 makes perfect sense.... and makes you appear more IEI-ish on the surface.
EII fits the bill. I related with plenty you said by the way, though there were some differences. One similarity is that my childhood was filled with writing, as well as drawing and making music. I have written fantasy/romance type short stories as well, lyrics, etc. I got really tired of journaling though and find that and more formal writing tedious, though I get a lot of positive feedback and told I should write basically.
"I dress conservatively. Dark clothing. My color scheme is black and grey with occasion of burgundy or indigo. I don’t try to get people's attention with what I wear, nothing eye catching." lol this is supposed to be very type 4 and I can relate. I tend to toggle between dark and very light (rainbow). "Gothish" one day, "raverish" one day, grungeish another, delicate yet another. I love wearing all of those colors you mentioned, truly, gray, burgundy, I wear these often, and my favorite color is indigo (in the past i've cited black, indigo/purple and green as being my favorites, but I honestly like and wear the whole fucking rainbow, but I do feel "at home" in many of these colors you mentioned).
I don't know how I feel about this dude really and I feel he is biased in some sort of strong ways, but you may find this of interest if you haven't already seen it.
I get the sense that my EIE friend feels this way too and just doesn't want to accept that I'm very likely an EII (the more I watch myself in person, this becomes apparent)... even though for a while he thought I was one... I think EII's, like many of the types, are misunderstood, and people have a hard time accepting someone might be of their own type when their are several differences, but, there are only 16 types and 5000000000 factors that go into the making of a person.
don't worry dude, he's a bit dramatic about the 4's in general, don't know if you caught the comment about liking to wear black, reds, and purples thoughI'm extremely sensitive and easily hurt, but I don't always show it, I tend to not and then go hide somewhere and cry lol.
The thing about being selective with friends someone mentioned lol. That is 100 percent (broken percent key) me also. I don't like shallow relationships much
I still see EII Tosk
NORMAL, I vote NORMAL. Nah really though, idk, you seem potentially harmonic to me![]()
If random noobs think you, especially without good typing data, as having EII - this can't be a mistake
"to do everything and nothing until you die"
this reminds P types
J types, being more rational, want to do only what is good and useful
death theme - Ni value
your profile avatar with the snake and rotten apple on black background is rather dark for delta F. same for depressive main avatar. more for Ni value
the structure of the title is wrong from the point of language. more to P
Seems you type to own identity/duals mostly Fe/Ti people, - so can be attracted by them and so to have Fe valued type
Based on the seen, I suspect mostly IEI and 2nd EIE for you. The most in your "duals" women are N, so your S type is not excluded still. And it's low possibly for delta F.
I need your video for nonverbal, anyway.
=
looked your gallery with more attention:
delta F in your betas: Tyson Ritter/Cillian Murphy/Kate Bush - EII, Gene Wilder - IEE, Amanda Peet - mb IEE
in deltas: Michael Fassbender - EII, Emma Thompson - mb EII, Shari Lewis/Toby Turner/Brandon Calvillo/Keegan-Michael Key/Zach Braff - mb IEE
in EII males a quantity of base Ti. the most seem T. no Fi types ; as you should identify yourself with them, - mb have T type too
in EII females: 2/15 are Fi
in IEE males: 4/18 are Fi. many Ti and beta F
in IEE females: 1/14 is Fi
in LSE males: a quantity of EIE. some LIE. beta T. no Si types
in LSE females: almost all Fe/Ti. 1/8 mb Si
in SLI males: many betas, 2 / 12 are Si
in SLE females: many betas, no Si
resume: you are much doubtful to be delta F. you do not get what is Fi and not attracted to Si
Last edited by Sol; 11-10-2019 at 07:37 PM.
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
IR effects should was been taken into account when you did the gallery. as "LSE" are people which inspire the most sympathy
after 2nd look
Liev Schreiber - mb LSI. a possibility for LSE and other
Mark Wahlberg - SLE
Sean Larkin - LIE
Matt Damon - LIE
James McAvoy - seems N
Guillaume Musso - mb SEE
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - EIE
Divian Ladwa - not *SE, at least
Steven Crowder - mb ESE. a Si was noticed
Harvey Weinstein - SLE
Billy Joel - mb SEE
Ian McShane - EIE
Aaron Marino - EIE, or LSI/SLE
Hugh Jackman - mb IEI
Arnold Schwarzenegger - LSI
Mitt Romney - ILE
Jeri Ryan - *EE
Christina Applegate - *LE
Radha Mitchell - IEI
Elin Nordegren - not LSE, at least. no video interviews
Lene Nystrøm - IE*
Julie Bowen - mb EIE
Candice Bergen - LSI
Natascha McElhone - EIE
there is strong lack of Si types among people you may like the most. the clear most are Se valued
there are weird avatars from the taste of delta: death, depression, dark colors. themes which attract Se valued mostly
if to exclude close to LSE types, the rest are: SEE, EIE, IEI, IEE, ILE. the IR factor for them is higher. most of these types should not be in too bad IR with you alike superego/subrevisie/suborderie. most of them are F and this is not LSE's trait, what may point on your T type.
I'm rather sure that delta F is not your type. Then that your type is Se valued. That F is not clear and you may be T type.
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
your "EII men", people with which you should perceive your similarity
Adrien Brody - mb EIE. or INT*
Liam Neeson - LII
Sufjan Stevens - IEI
Michael Angelakos - I*TJ
Andrew Garfield - LII
John Mayer - LSI
Guy Pearce - mb LIE
John Green - ILE
James Earl Jones - SEE
Jemaine Clement - LSI
Robert Pattinson - ILE, LII
Nick Cave - LIE [look at Hugo Weaving]
Jim Adkins - mb LSI
10 / 13 are T
among T 8/10 are Ti
if to exlude close to EII types and the ones having only 1 place: LSI, LIE, ILE. the only common dichotomy is T, what may point on your T
your face looks familiar. do not remember clearly did I saw your video. I typed many ones, including on forums and may forget
you look emotionally cold on the gallery photo. if I saw the video and you'd was EII I'd remembered you with more chance
base Fi I perceive as having "warm and kind" sight. and some childish. you are other on that photo. in common, F types express emotions on own portraits, not "poker face"
Se valued Ti: LSI, SLE. You seem a quiter than SLE
among your possible types is LSI. this would explained many betas in your "EII duals"
in the situation with Ted Bundy you've shown the abbility to notice the visual similarity of people with close types (good S), but did not understood the traits expressed by the nonverbal (weak N)
-
during VI look into the eyes of people. concentrate on what traits they express, the impressions they arouse in you. F types are not indifferent, not cold, but are emotional, touchy hearts, there is energy flow from their eyes. they rarely express emotions fakely when the eyes and the rest face express the different. they also are not seen as "seriously thinking", but some naive. it's in common
the concentration on superego predisposes to depressive states, what is opposite to inpiration and self-esteem what inspire duals by activating your superid functions. if you have LSI and depressive state - this may be accompanied my higher attention on your superego regions, to be a factor to mistype yourself to EII
look at EIE people among my bloggers. if they inspire an inner harmony feeling - it's what duals do
mb I helped to you
wbr
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
your face remind me of Charles Gross lol:
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
it doesn't take him much time to do these typings, because he only uses VI. he probably doesn't know anything about most of these people, and you can clearly see that in his typings. that's also why he can type so many people, and the amusing thing is that he probably thinks most of these typings are right, and of course he will never admit that he made a mistake.
I think your communication style on this website is very sincere and open minded. when I compare it to my way of writing, I would say that you're an ethical type, and that Ti and Se are the functions that you probably value the least. I also think that many of your EII typings are correct, which makes me think that you have quite a lot of experience with this type. it's hard to type people here since there's often little information that you can work with, but my overall impression of you is that you are an INFx type, and that EII is very likely. just my 2 cents
the example of base Fi is @Luminous Lynx
you may compare your emotionality with him to notice the difference
he also did a video for a typing
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
Toska
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html