...
...
Last edited by Retiree; 10-14-2019 at 09:15 PM.
...
Last edited by Retiree; 10-14-2019 at 09:15 PM.
...
Last edited by Retiree; 10-14-2019 at 09:15 PM.
...
Last edited by Retiree; 10-14-2019 at 09:17 PM.
I don't see why not LSE.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
NO Private messages, please. Use Discord instead.
Delta ST seems quite consistent throughout the results.
agree with the above.
maybe expound on what makes you hesitate from settling on LSE?
forsitan mea potentia increvit nimis
...
Last edited by Retiree; 10-14-2019 at 09:17 PM.
Ne is a bitch, Mesn. Unless you use it for engineering design possibilities.
Do you ever talk publicly about sex? If the answer is No, you are probably Delta.
Whoa. Just saw your pictures. The first one is LIE, the second one clearly LSE. The third one is ???. Fe? Fe-role?
But you sound very LSE in chat, so I’ll go with LSE.
...
Last edited by Retiree; 10-14-2019 at 09:17 PM.
That’s probably a big, easy-to-see difference between LIE’s and LSE’s. While our thinking processes are nearly identical, LIE’s are often very inappropriate, while LSE’s always behave respectably.
...
Last edited by Retiree; 10-14-2019 at 09:18 PM.
While our thinking processes are nearly identical, LIE’s are often very inappropriate, while LSE’s always behave respectably.
seems to me more accurate to say that when LIE behave disrespectfully it looks much more intentional. I regularly meet LIE (certainly not all, but still) whose shtick it is to be low-key abusive and see what they can get away with.
in contrast, LSE will at worst just be a little blunt and too straight forward, like a doctor without bedside manners who blurts out the bad news.
I've had an LSE friend who was pretty foul-mouthed too, in a kind of oblivious way, not realizing that the words he used as filler were offensive to others. no bad intentions, just lack of social awareness on a kind of oafish level.
forsitan mea potentia increvit nimis
This thread proves the uselessness of questionnaires. Bunch of tests, visual confirmation; bam, typing done. Thanks Mesn.
Heart > Head > Gut >
Soul
LIE-Ni (mongoose-unicorn-leopard-eagle mix)) EII-Fi (dolphin) SEE-Se (dragon) ILI-Te (phoenix)
4w3 (swan) 5w6 (owl) 8w9 (bear) 9w1 (griffin)
sx/sp (tiger) sx/so (dragon) so/sx (cockatrice) so/sp (dog)
Neutral Good True Neutral Chaotic Evil P Chaotic Neutral
ELVF LEVF FVLE VLEF
INFP. INTJ ENTP ISTP
C N H D
additional*: Supersoul = SLI-Si 6w5 sx/so LVFE Lawful Neutral - H - INTP
quintype: 4-5-8-9-6 (Panther)
Priority (default) 1-heart, 2-head, 3-gut- 4-soul 5-supersoul. This priority orden can vary both inmanently and situationally (enneagram)
...
Last edited by Retiree; 10-14-2019 at 09:18 PM.
Heart > Head > Gut >
Soul
LIE-Ni (mongoose-unicorn-leopard-eagle mix)) EII-Fi (dolphin) SEE-Se (dragon) ILI-Te (phoenix)
4w3 (swan) 5w6 (owl) 8w9 (bear) 9w1 (griffin)
sx/sp (tiger) sx/so (dragon) so/sx (cockatrice) so/sp (dog)
Neutral Good True Neutral Chaotic Evil P Chaotic Neutral
ELVF LEVF FVLE VLEF
INFP. INTJ ENTP ISTP
C N H D
additional*: Supersoul = SLI-Si 6w5 sx/so LVFE Lawful Neutral - H - INTP
quintype: 4-5-8-9-6 (Panther)
Priority (default) 1-heart, 2-head, 3-gut- 4-soul 5-supersoul. This priority orden can vary both inmanently and situationally (enneagram)
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
Heart > Head > Gut >
Soul
LIE-Ni (mongoose-unicorn-leopard-eagle mix)) EII-Fi (dolphin) SEE-Se (dragon) ILI-Te (phoenix)
4w3 (swan) 5w6 (owl) 8w9 (bear) 9w1 (griffin)
sx/sp (tiger) sx/so (dragon) so/sx (cockatrice) so/sp (dog)
Neutral Good True Neutral Chaotic Evil P Chaotic Neutral
ELVF LEVF FVLE VLEF
INFP. INTJ ENTP ISTP
C N H D
additional*: Supersoul = SLI-Si 6w5 sx/so LVFE Lawful Neutral - H - INTP
quintype: 4-5-8-9-6 (Panther)
Priority (default) 1-heart, 2-head, 3-gut- 4-soul 5-supersoul. This priority orden can vary both inmanently and situationally (enneagram)
...
Last edited by Retiree; 10-14-2019 at 09:18 PM.
...
Last edited by Retiree; 10-14-2019 at 09:19 PM.
not L*E due to lack of the reason
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
...
Last edited by Retiree; 10-14-2019 at 09:19 PM.
"I will make a video soon"
2 weeks ago
base Te have more respect to own primises
after you'll make the video, you'll give the normal typing info, then you'll can be typed correctly with not bad chance. what you do at now, noob, is a game in types with hysterical protections what reminds F types. Fe ones
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
Dude. I have other activities as well, and I had to buy a selfie stick to do it. And you have my video in my latest post, reuploaded (I can give you screens it was there before and no one replied to it). You ignored it for more than a week when it was there, which - by your own logic - makes an F type for you likely.
LSE final type
You have wide set eyes very typical of LSE <3
And, you focus on the logics of other people’s argument is a given
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Socialization is not part of E/I. Functions don’t pick objects but they are how one is oriented towards an object thus making a lot of extrovert types introverts in the social area
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
...
Last edited by Retiree; 10-14-2019 at 09:21 PM.
I think he's a normalising or harmonising subtype, so he has accentuated introverted functions. I'm leaning more towards the former. the way he describes himself makes me heavily lean towards LSE.
...
Last edited by Retiree; 10-14-2019 at 09:21 PM.
...
Last edited by Retiree; 10-14-2019 at 09:21 PM.