Originally Posted by
voider
You've still refused to answer the valid points I made about the relations between enneagram and socionics, though. And it's quite obvious that I was just making fun of you with my previous statement. Don't quote me unless you're planning on giving an actual argument pertaining to what we discussed, rather than repeating one phrase over and over again and underlining words in screenshots. If you need it repeated, a "thinking" type does not absolutely have to be a logical type, because ethical types also think, they just arrive to conclusions based on ethical principles rather than pure logic. It *can* be, and there are certainly strong connections between T and 5, for example, but to say that a 7 can't be a ethical type shows how little you understand people and how bad you are at applying the theory in real life.