Logically rationalize God

[Socionics Is A Cult]

It's a chemical reaction. 2 CO (g) + O2 (g) 2 CO2 (g)



It's a process that depends on where we're starting from. Ex: Sperm and Egg. Ex 2: Fully grown Human beings with skin cells that self replicate.




It's a process that depends on where we're starting from. Ex: Water and light helps a plant grow



Instinctual mechanism via DNA/adaptation

How do we determine what the minimal level of what qualifies for concepts such as life / consciousness / intelligence? I'm sorry if that question is a little difficult.

[Computer Loser]

How do we determine what the minimal level of what qualifies for concepts such as life / consciousness / intelligence? I'm sorry if that question is a little difficult.

We can try putting random pieces of DNA floating around in a swamp and see if they self-replicate.

I dunno

It is difficult because nobody knows

[hatchback176]

How do we determine what the minimal level of what qualifies for concepts such as life / consciousness / intelligence? I'm sorry if that question is a little difficult.

Life:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert...gist)#Research
Consciousness:
https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbi...l.pcbi.1003588
Intelligence [generalized]:
http://hology.org/

A self-processing and self-configuring language [SCSPL, Intelligence] substantiated by a minimally-irreducible conceptual system [MICS, Consciousness] that metabolizes, repairs, and replicates [M,R-Diagrams, Life].

[Socionics Is A Cult]

Life:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert...gist)#Research
Consciousness:
https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbi...l.pcbi.1003588
Intelligence [generalized]:
http://hology.org/

A self-processing and self-configuring language [SCSPL, Intelligence] substantiated by a minimally-irreducible conceptual system [MICS, Consciousness] that metabolizes, repairs, and replicates [M,R-Diagrams, Life].

Ultimately, determining what qualifies is a philosophical question, not a scientific one.

[hatchback176]

Ultimately, determining what qualifies is a philosophical question, not a scientific one.

Ultimately what determines a philosopher is a scientific question

[Socionics Is A Cult]

Ultimately what determines a philosopher is a scientific question

Does the meaning of words have any relevance to physical reality?

[hatchback176]

Does the meaning of words have any relevance to physical reality?

Yes, I think it's easy to make the case that the language faculty and verbal memory set the context for actions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langua...e_(philosophy)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heideg...#Ready-to-hand

Word orders generally fall into some permutation of subject-verb-object agreement. This can be adapted for observations, instructions, sequencing visual associations, and all the other stuff you'd expect from a speech stream coordinating inter-hemispheric transfers in the human brain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjec...E2%80%93object

[Socionics Is A Cult]

Yes, I think it's easy to make the case that the language faculty and verbal memory set the context for actions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Langua...e_(philosophy)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heideg...#Ready-to-hand

Word orders generally fall into some permutation of subject-verb-object agreement. This can be adapted for observations, instructions, sequencing visual associations, and all the other stuff you'd expect from a speech stream coordinating inter-hemispheric transfers in the human brain.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subjec...E2%80%93object

But words themselves are not matters of fact - they're merely substitute for pictures.