Quote Originally Posted by jason_m View Post
I guess what I'm saying is:

- If a person is genuinely logical in nature, they should be acknowledged as logical in the theory.
- If a person is logical in nature, they should be acknowledged as logical for the right reasons.
- If a person is evil in nature, the theory should identify their true nature.
- If a person is not logical, they should not be identified as logical.
- And if a person is good, they should be acknowledged as good (and for the right reasons).

And so on with every trait...
Yeah the fact that there is HuMaN QuAlItY and HuMaN DeVeLoPmEnT does really throw a wrench in the whole thing as Socionics doesn't give people a good way to parse it with itself. It just makes itself out to be like MBTI, but more confusing, with its only saving graces being more information and the self-checkable consistency of ITR.