I guess what I'm saying is:

- If a person is genuinely logical in nature, they should be acknowledged as logical in the theory.
- If a person is logical in nature, they should be acknowledged as logical for the right reasons.
- If a person is evil in nature, the theory should identify their true nature.
- If a person is not logical, they should not be identified as logical.
- And if a person is good, they should be acknowledged as good (and for the right reasons).

And so on with every trait...