Results 1 to 40 of 136

Thread: What's Wrong with Socionics - Take Two

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    3,595
    Mentioned
    264 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sbbds View Post
    Honestly this probably just doesn't bother me because I'm good at theoryweaving about why people are the way they are, in addition to enjoying being given the opportunity to do so. It's like a hangman game where you're given a few hints and get the joy of guessing and testing it and eventually figuring out the answer on your own. It's the blanks in the information that make it fun like a game.
    Yes you naturally come up with theories, because that's what people naturally do all the time. But Socionics is about removing and expunging all those theories and theorizing from its system.

    You may think that Socionics is a theory, but if it were, then it would come up with explanations for why people are the way that they are.

  2. #2
    f.k.a Oprah sbbds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    TIM
    EII typed by Gulenko
    Posts
    4,654
    Mentioned
    339 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Singu View Post
    Yes you naturally come up with theories, because that's what people naturally do all the time. But Socionics is about removing and expunging all those theories and theorizing from its system.

    You may think that Socionics is a theory, but if it were, then it would come up with explanations for why people are the way that they are.
    In the colloquial sense, any statement on reality can be looked at as a kind of theory. Albeit I concede that it's not scientific on its own though, if I ever said that, not that it can't be taken and attempted to be made scientific, or have scientific thinking applied to it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •