Abbie needs to reconsider her type.
Calling her duals pushovers and seeing some EII behaviorial characteristics as issues is just enough proof.
Abbie needs to reconsider her type.
Calling her duals pushovers and seeing some EII behaviorial characteristics as issues is just enough proof.
Originally Posted by Marep
This thread isn't about either of us.
Here's my type-me thread if you want to press the issue.
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...fter-Two-Years
Criticizing the EIIs you met for not being productive and ambitious, also calling them pushovers... it's obvious you value SE.
This thread isn't about either of us.
Here's my type-me thread if you want to press the issue.
https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...fter-Two-Years
Also, I talk slowly, and I never met other EIIs that didn't, it's just our functional order, which makes us think deeply and carefully before spilling words.
I could see LIE as a type for Abbie to be honest. Her Se is not in the ego block either. Se valuing, but weak Se is the most hostile to signs of weakness in others because they lack the volition to compensate for it.
I personally thought she was LSI, but what you say makes perfect sense.
Also, calling people pushovers is the very last thing I would expect from a caregiver type.
Oh yes, I've observed that in my SEI E9 brother. I could get him to do things more easily than anyone else in the family. But my requests were always reasonable. "Wash these pans so I can make dinner for you." rather than, "Throw away these wrappers you're collecting because it's a mess."
I stole his keyring decoration right in front of his face. I still have it.
Also I think an LIE typing is particularly silly as I always score highest in Si on tests.
B&D can vouch for my lack of Ni.
Though I do see how Tozo would see me as a non-caregiver as I behave more coldly to people who I see as overly sexual. (Sexuality is a huge turn-off.)
He seems to have mellowed out since I've been gone though.
BnD is ESI, so maybe a little but not really.
I thought we did okay when we met each other. What do you think?
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I have never seen anyone so at odds with Abbie, and that makes me feel that you are not an EII. Because EIIs just don't get that annoyed with what LSE has to say or how they say it.
[This is not personal against you. I haven't read your other posts. I have read plenty of Abbie's and I feel quite sure she is LSE. And a LOT of people mistype themselves.]
"A man with a definite belief always appears bizarre, because he does not change with the world; he has climbed into a fixed star, and the earth whizzes below him like a zoetrope."
........ G. ........... K. ............... C ........ H ........ E ...... S ........ T ...... E ........ R ........ T ........ O ........ N ........
"Having a clear faith, based on the creed of the Church, is often labeled today as fundamentalism... Whereas relativism, which is letting oneself be tossed and swept along
by every wind of teaching, looks like the only
attitude acceptable to today's standards." - Pope Benedict the XVI, "The Dictatorship of Relativism"
.
.
.
from his reaction he is most def EII. I just feel like he related too strongly to what she said, it had to strike a nerve or something. Probably felt punched in the Se PoLR, which is why I def think they are EII.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
