Delete this account.
Ayeee
Delete this account.
Last edited by hejejskoaoakksjehe; 07-19-2019 at 07:36 PM.
Welcome. You always fit perfectly into a type, if you consider subtypes also. Socionics is your real type so if you really are SEI then you should type yourself ISFP in mbti. But best is to forget mbti since it is flawed.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Yeah i hear you. Talked to some other peeps and they were saying SLE is best fit. Open to analysis, posted somethin in the What's my type forum.Originally Posted by Tallmo
You'll never fit perfectly to your type as what you see is influenced by different factors besides Jung types. You can be sure in some your type if you _stably_ fit to that type _more_ than to any other type.
While subtypes and other baseless heresies are not Socionics and used often to rationalize mistakes.
> But best is to forget mbti since it is flawed.
It has correct and good described dichotomies which today Socionics has taken from there. They have not bad test MBTI, which Socionics has reworked to create own dichotomies tests. Also Socionics has taken the idea that Jung's type is something "ok", when Jung thought the opposite - as a distortion of psyche which makes inner conflicts, besides leads to partial infantile inadequateness.
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote