Delete this account.
Ayeee
Delete this account.
Last edited by hejejskoaoakksjehe; 07-19-2019 at 08:36 PM.
Welcome. You always fit perfectly into a type, if you consider subtypes also. Socionics is your real type so if you really are SEI then you should type yourself ISFP in mbti. But best is to forget mbti since it is flawed.
A true sense-perception certainly exists, but it always looks as though objects were not so much forcing their way into the subject in their own right as that the subject were seeing things quite differently, or saw quite other things than the rest of mankind. As a matter of fact, the subject perceives the same things as everybody else, only, he never stops at the purely objective effect, but concerns himself with the subjective perception released by the objective stimulus.
(Jung on Si)
My Pinterest
Yeah i hear you. Talked to some other peeps and they were saying SLE is best fit. Open to analysis, posted somethin in the What's my type forum.Originally Posted by Tallmo
You'll never fit perfectly to your type as what you see is influenced by different factors besides Jung types. You can be sure in some your type if you _stably_ fit to that type _more_ than to any other type.
While subtypes and other baseless heresies are not Socionics and used often to rationalize mistakes.
> But best is to forget mbti since it is flawed.
It has correct and good described dichotomies which today Socionics has taken from there. They have not bad test MBTI, which Socionics has reworked to create own dichotomies tests. Also Socionics has taken the idea that Jung's type is something "ok", when Jung thought the opposite - as a distortion of psyche which makes inner conflicts, besides leads to partial infantile inadequateness.
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote