What does S-ego-ness feel like?

[The Reality Denialist]

Well - theoretically, neither intuition nor sensing is ''analytical'' in nature, as the whole idea of ''perception'' in Socionics refers to something that is an immediate process, something that takes precedence over the ''analysis'', which in Socionics refers to logics and ethics. The conscious, analytical, decisive mind is thus geared towards logical and ethical processes, not intuitive or sensory.

I'm not sure what you mean by ''easier to do for the brain''? Theoretically, each TIM finds difficulties and challenges in separate fields of processing - to dive into imagination or to perceive externality or stimuli with nuance is easy for some and hard for others. (theoretically, i'm not even positive in the so called division between sensory and imaginary processes)

What do you type as, btw?

Just like someone could exert pressure to their surroundings or tune into their surroundings (note: this is irrational) as in sensing and intuition also does similar things like noting the "irrational currency of the information" or just extrapolating/interpolating it based on quite random databases.

[para]

Just like someone could exert pressure to their surroundings or tune into their surroundings (note: this is irrational) as in sensing and intuition also does similar things like noting the "irrational currency of the information" or just extrapolating/interpolating it based on quite random databases.

Yes: the perception notes the need for stability and algorithm in the input/output of information, as the perception extrapolates based on an idea of unity - there is a common ground for all information in nature, not just in how i process it through ''judging'' elements. P types are absolutists in this regard, even with the reflection on the need for division and stability in information.