Dichotomies doesn't change according to subtypes. In most basic terms, all dichotomies are based on the positions of IEs, the position of IEs does not change according to subtype. How do you think it is possible?

Quote Originally Posted by ooo View Post
@Disturbed, I'm not a fan of Reinin dichotomies myself, and they're not common among socionists too, but in reality the differences are evident as the types can vary very much.

A LIE-NI doesn't become a ILI, but works following similar patterns, and his psychic stacking will be left unvaried in the order, so that both a LIE and a LIE-Ni will still aim at Fi, but a LIE more so, while a LIE-Ni will be more drawn to Se than a normal LIE would, and will be able to use Fi more too (contact functions are all boosted).
This is irrelevant. LIE-Ni still would get information from S and according to the links you shared, that still makes LIE a result type regardless of subtype.

Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
The dichotomies probably vary smoothly, as do the functions. As does shoe size.

Follow the shift from Te-dom to Ni-dom. Where do the dichotomies become obviously distinguishable?

LIE-Te - LIE - LIE-Ni - ILI-Te - ILI - ILI-Ni
How do you think it varies? Which dichotomies are we talking about?