The Rise of Far Left Extremism

[Adam Strange]

it certainly wasn't a made up thing because you see the exact manifestation of what he was talking about in today's society. He focused on defining how ideological subversion works dividing it into 4 stages (through process called brainwashing):
The first stage is called "demoralization" which takes from 15 to 20 years to achieve. According to the former KGB agent, that is the minimum number of years it takes to re-educate one generation of students that is normally exposed to the ideology of its country. In other words, the time it takes to change what the people are thinking.
Once demoralization is completed, the second stage of ideological brainwashing is "destabilization". During this two-to-five-year period what matters is the targeting of essential structural elements of a nation: economy, foreign relations, and defense systems. Basically, the subverter (any ruling ideology) would look to destabilize every one of those areas in the United States, considerably weakening it.
The third stage would be "crisis". It would take only up to six weeks to send a country into crisis. The crisis would bring "a violent change of power, structure, and economy" and will be followed by the last stage, "normalization." That's when your country is basically taken over, living under a new ideology and reality.

you decide at which stage we currently are.

An interesting take on Revolution. I think it is sort of like having driving instructions for a spaceship when you actually have a sandbox.

I don't believe that you can create a revolution in a country just by re-educating the youth. I've never seen any examples of this. Instead, my theory of revolution states that there are only two classes that matter. The class with political power and the class with money. When the two classes consist of the same people, no revolution. When the classes consist of different people, then there will be revolution.

I could elaborate if you care to hear about it. Otherwise, I'm pretty busy right now and I hope your day goes well.

[miss BabyDoll]

An interesting take on Revolution. I think it is sort of like having driving instructions for a spaceship when you actually have a sandbox.

I don't believe that you can create a revolution in a country just by re-educating the youth. I've never seen any examples of this. Instead, my theory of revolution states that there are only two classes that matter. The class with political power and the class with money. When the two classes consist of the same people, no revolution. When the classes consist of different people, then there will be revolution.

I could elaborate if you care to hear about it. Otherwise, I'm pretty busy right now and I hope your day goes well.

you haven't seen them? well do a cross-sectional comparative study of educational systems 20 years ago and now. worst revolutions are the silent, subversive and gradual ones you're not even aware of.

[Adam Strange]

you haven't seen them? well do a cross-sectional comparative study of educational systems 20 years ago and now. worst revolutions are the silent, subversive and gradual ones you're not even aware of.

Lol. The ones I'm not even aware of. Like the one in the Sagittarius sector?

You show me your revolutions and I'll show you mine.
I studied revolutions for several years, when I wanted to overthrow the government of the US. I learned a lot in the process.

Actually, I can't do this right now. I have to do some work. But, I'll be back later today.

[miss BabyDoll]

Lol. The ones I'm not even aware of. Like the one in the Sagittarius sector?

You show me your revolutions and I'll show you mine.
I studied revolutions for several years, when I wanted to overthrow the government of the US. I learned a lot in the process.

Actually, I can't do this right now. I have to do some work. But, I'll be back later today.

i've instructed you what to do if you truly wish to study this topic in-depth and i have given you point of reference (the bezmenov study). i'm not interested in futile dialogue so this is where our discussion ends.