Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Instincts: inborn, a compensation for what's lacking, or a combination of both?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    TIM
    LIE-Ni 8w7 sx/sp
    Posts
    379
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    They're inborn, such that people can readily construct post-facto narratives justifying how they 'became that way'.

    Naturally, "lack of connection" and what not would be salient to an Sx-primary.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    TIM
    IEI 4w5
    Posts
    552
    Mentioned
    41 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Good point, it makes sense you'd notice a lack in the thing that's most important to you. With the plasticity abilities of our brains I do sometimes wonder how much can be changed with environment, though. Any particular reason you think they're inborn vs learned?

    Maybe nature is responsible for the instinct order, but nurture plays the dominant role in our levels of development or health...

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    TIM
    LIE-Ni 8w7 sx/sp
    Posts
    379
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Emily View Post
    With the plasticity abilities of our brains I do sometimes wonder how much can be changed with environment, though.
    Human brains of course exhibit a high degree of neuroplasticity. But this has more to do with learning, acquisition of new skills, altering conditioned habits and thought patterns, etc.

    Willfully directed neuroplasticity is a thing—but the directed ends chosen will be heavily implicated in one's genetic proclivities.

    Rewriting basal motivations probably isn't entirely impossible, just understandably difficult… and strikes me as a morbid act of egoic self-destruction, which one should be wondering why they're bothering to do. You're better off embracing who you are and figuring out how to get what you want, rather than cauterizing yourself into changing what you want.

    Any particular reason you think they're inborn vs learned?
    Because they're fairly self-evident at an early age, and seemingly operate at a deeper/visceral level of interpersonal compatibility than other typological measures. It's more vital than socionics intertype relations, for instance.

    And more generally speaking I'm largely a genetic determinist, as growing evidence continues to mount in favor of that outlook. We find more and more that "nurture" & "environment" are largely irrelevant; people 'become' what they were already born to be.

    Maybe nature is responsible for the instinct order, but nurture plays the dominant role in our levels of development or health...
    Environmental factors would certainly play a role in neurosis, i.e. when the primary instinct isn't being satisfied, or when too much demand is being placed on the tertiary instinct.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    TIM
    LIE-Ni 8w7 sx/sp
    Posts
    379
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Emily View Post
    Many of my closest friendships have been out of my own quadra but share the same flow or stacking. Whereas I've had issues (the closer we got) with fellow quadramates who were either a different flow or Sx-last. I don't know if I'd say instincts are more important than intertype relations (at least for me), they're just...a totally different thing.
    Stacks definitely override intertypes IME. If there's no chemistry, we're gonna have a hard time.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •